Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 43 total)
You can also put the candidate values in a table and join to it if FTS is not an option.
October 20, 2007 at 9:53 am
I would definitely recommend upgrading your dev server to more current bits. In general, your dev environment should mirror your production environment as closely as possible (hardware as well as...
September 30, 2006 at 2:45 am
Hello lucas..
It's unclear to me whether the data made it into SQL Server correctly; that ambiguity would certainly color my response here.
If you run a select statement on your SQL...
September 30, 2006 at 2:38 am
Actually, the DDL for both tables would be helpful.
Chances are, as jezemine suggests, one or more of your source columns is/are shorter than the destination.
Hope this helps..
September 30, 2006 at 2:36 am
Hi Ron..
How about copying the pertinent code out of sp_helplogins and writing your own procedure?
Hope this helps..
September 12, 2006 at 11:04 am
Hi Nelson..
What datatype is expected by the stored procedure?
The error message suggests that the stored procedure is coded with an nvarchar parameter. Changing it to varbinary(max) should resolve this issue.
Hope...
September 11, 2006 at 10:20 am
Hi Sugesh..
It sounds as though you're making a linked server call in your trigger. This is very dangerous, as the local DML action that fired the trigger (INSERT or UPDATE)...
September 11, 2006 at 10:18 am
Have you downloaded the July, 2006 BOL?
August 29, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Hi Ninel..
Based on your error message, it seems as though you might have an impersonation issue. Check out this link in the latest BOL (web-posted on 21 July 2006):
ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v9/MS.SQLSVR.v9.en/udb9/html/18a64236-0285-46ea-8929-6ee9bcc020b9.htm
Hope this...
August 29, 2006 at 12:10 pm
About the only place I've seen dynamic SQL used to good effect in this type of scenario is for a search function with wildly variant parameters. There's a series of...
August 29, 2006 at 12:01 pm
Hi Deon..
If I understand your question correctly, this is not possible. In order to do what you're trying to do, you'll need to employ either Dynamic SQL or sp_executesql.
There might...
August 28, 2006 at 10:48 am
I would suggest that your second sproc access the contents of the temp table rather than the results of a SELECT run against it. These steps would likely render your...
August 25, 2006 at 2:47 pm
I had a similar requirement and ended up going with what you're calling an odometer table. Even then, locking and concurrency were issues. Here's the code I ended up with...
August 25, 2006 at 2:42 pm
Hi RGR..
According to this link (scroll down to the Manageability topic), Profiler is only shipped with the Standard and Enterprise Editions.
Hope this helps.
August 25, 2006 at 2:31 pm
Jules is correct. This strikes me as a violation of first normal form.
Remember, the ability to do a particular thing doesn't necessarily make it a good idea..
July 21, 2006 at 10:18 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 43 total)