Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
No jeff ........still working on it.
June 20, 2012 at 1:12 am
This is not a pure data ware house. This code is already developed by other team. Currently we are doing optimization. we cant change this logic, because it will affect...
June 13, 2012 at 9:13 am
No Gail shaw, it is not like that. we are also doing both the steps.
June 13, 2012 at 8:57 am
GilaMonster, That is a very good question. We are doing a kind of data ware housing , here we are creating set of tables for reports.After running this procedure these...
June 13, 2012 at 8:46 am
24 Processors,
Max degree of Parallelism : 0
Max server Mem : 2147483647
Any clue?
June 13, 2012 at 8:17 am
All of your information are valid, but performance is not improving.
Some times batches take much longer time 🙂
June 13, 2012 at 8:07 am
sp_spaceused - information
60656288 - reserved
32717008 - data
27924440 - index_size
14840 - unused
June 13, 2012 at 7:21 am
Thanks for all your answers. I will try give more information in coming days.
June 3, 2012 at 7:50 pm
This is a kind of data warehouse table. we are creating reports after running this procedure. It is doing Index scan too.. There is an auto increment column named...
June 1, 2012 at 5:31 am
I found the issue, Some one from onsite has been calling the SP simultaneously.Thanks all for your Great replies...
December 22, 2011 at 7:33 pm
@dev : I am restricted to post the code...sorry...
December 21, 2011 at 12:02 am
No...it is not happening. I ran the procedure 2 times...same error I am getting.
December 20, 2011 at 11:53 pm
Yes...It is all physical tables. No temporary tables....
December 20, 2011 at 11:49 pm
Sorry...When I post first ...I got some error...
December 20, 2011 at 11:48 pm
Thanks to all. It automatically solved...:-)
December 9, 2011 at 3:31 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)