Viewing 15 posts - 1,171 through 1,185 (of 1,201 total)
Too wishy-washy. A lot of conflicting advice in this editorial. Either take a stand one way or the other or don't even bother writing an editorial like this in the...
September 3, 2009 at 11:25 am
Lynn Pettis (8/7/2009)
talltop (8/7/2009)
Uh oh! thread hijack...GSquared, stay on point dude. We are talking about corporate production databases, not automobiles... apples and oranges....
Hate to tell you, but discussion threads here...
August 7, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Old Hand,
I was expressing my PERSONAL opinion that I DO consider that elementary type of db ignorance of DBA team members so common as frightening. Particularly, on production databases holding...
August 7, 2009 at 11:31 am
Disagreeing with someone is much different than personally attacking them. Show me anywhere I have attacked anyone personally?
August 7, 2009 at 11:13 am
Ol'SureHand (8/7/2009)
Michael Oberhardt (7/14/2008)
August 7, 2009 at 10:55 am
Uh oh! thread hijack...GSquared, stay on point dude. We are talking about corporate production databases, not automobiles... apples and oranges....
August 7, 2009 at 10:29 am
I'll take your word for it Gail, but I must say with billions of dollars of corporations revenue on SQL Server databases nowadays this is truly a scary thing to...
August 7, 2009 at 6:58 am
Whooaaa! really? Well maybe it is just me but if I had someone on my DBA maintenance team/rotation that did not know what the different db recovery models were then...
August 7, 2009 at 6:44 am
Ok, if that was your only point then I guess I'm not understanding the point of bringing simple mode up on a dev server in a thread where the t-log...
August 7, 2009 at 6:22 am
Because if that 100gb physical space is not reclaimed another t-log on that server may not be able to expand if that 100gb is the last 100gb available on the...
August 7, 2009 at 6:00 am
WRONG! A db in Simple recovery mode does NOT guarantee that the transaction log will
shrink in size or not grow and thus cure an out of disk space problem....
August 7, 2009 at 5:33 am
This is a perfect example of non dba technical staff having a little knowledge just enough to be very DANGEROUS! Let alone them having sysadmin access to that production box...
August 7, 2009 at 4:35 am
Yep, and this will work just as well..in SQL 2000,2005, & 2008
SELECT count(*) FROM sysobjects
WHERE type = 'U' AND name NOT LIKE 'dt%'
GO
However, I must say that this is a...
June 23, 2009 at 3:50 pm
No it isn't... I mentioned it back on the first page of this thread. No data was lost..I am not sure where you are getting that from. the files were...
June 15, 2009 at 2:32 pm
Yep, now that we have the list, getting the last modifed date of the detached files is a piece of cake. Going forward, all detached database files will be moved...
June 15, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,171 through 1,185 (of 1,201 total)