Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 181 total)
Oh yeah, this is the same Microsoft that recently stated they can't find enough qualified workers in the US, and they say we have to import IT help from other...
May 7, 2008 at 5:51 am
dave platt (4/28/2008)
Ref varchar(10)
Invoice:
InvoiceNumber int, CustomerRef varchar(10)
InvoiceDetails
id int, InvoiceNumber int, CustomerRef varchar(10)
SELECT inv.*, det.*
FROM Invoice AS inv
INNER JOIN
InvoiceDetails AS det
...
April 28, 2008 at 6:04 am
I don't volunteer a salary history because I don't want that to be the main consideration before I even get to the interview. I consider my last salary irrelevant...
April 11, 2008 at 6:00 am
Remember that 'datetime' stores time out to the milliseconds...
'mm'dd'yyyy hh:mm:ss.###'
Your comparison datetime is only showing seconds...'3/20/2008 9:51:30'.
Check your data to see if your datetime column values have a millisecond component...
April 10, 2008 at 6:42 am
Like others have said, if you don't know an answer, be honest about it. Trying to talk your way thru something you don't know undermines your integrity (if you...
April 10, 2008 at 6:05 am
Yes, great question, just not implemented properly.
I am curious to how the question author missed the length for the nvarchar columns. Or am I missing something?
April 9, 2008 at 6:14 am
Try this...
GROUP BY #tempRespPriceSummary.ID_PRODUCT
April 8, 2008 at 6:21 am
Before I used a sub-table for each different product type, I would use a single 'ProductAttributes' table, and an attribute lookup table to hold an instance of each attribute. ...
April 7, 2008 at 1:41 pm
What is it about the data (records) that are being returned is not correct?
Are you getting too many records, too few records, none at all?
Start with your embedded query (I...
April 7, 2008 at 6:03 am
Here are some interesting links...more stuff on SQL than you ever wanted to know.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Miscellaneous/abriefhistoryofsql/1125/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL
This was quoted from wiki, but also on the other link.
The acronym SEQUEL...
April 4, 2008 at 2:50 pm
GSquared (4/4/2008)
They may or may not prefer to say it letter-by-letter, they're kind of required to by the fact that Sequel was an IBM trademark (might still be one, but...
April 4, 2008 at 2:34 pm
I view education of any form, whether formal or informal, as the one thing that can't be taken away from you. It is an investment in yourself, and personally, I...
April 4, 2008 at 1:50 pm
Sequel for me too...sounds funny when I hear people say 'S-Q-L Server'.
In my experience it has been non-users that say it spelled out. Now you go and tell me...
April 4, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Derek Dongray (4/4/2008)
Since the Si system was only extended in 1991 to include the Yotta- prefix, I'm sure it will be extended again once someone finds a need!
...you mean like...
April 4, 2008 at 8:38 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 181 total)