Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 154 total)

  • RE: Server Performance

    No flame wars please, but in my experience, as a rule of thumb, never never use SAN for databases.

    NAS on the other hand is great!

    The network stack is not the...

  • RE: Throttle Backup

    Sorry - I never answered that part!

    No, not as far as I am aware of!

  • RE: SQL Query

    I'm not sure I'm understanding what you need, but lets see if this works!

    SELECT table_1.id,table_1.Description, table_2.date1,table_2.date2

    FROM table_1

    LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT table_2.id, MAX(table_2.date1) AS MaxDate1 FROM table_2 GROUP BY table_2.id)...

  • RE: Throttle Backup

    Are you sure about your disc config - Two disks in RAID 5 doesn't sound right to me!

    I have to agree that the problem you are seeing is disc queue...

  • RE: Padding function

    I marginally prefer my version... Its a little shorter

    Needs comments I know, but the parameters are exactly the same

    CREATE FUNCTION fn_MyPadding (

    @TextAS VARCHAR(500),

    @CharAS CHAR(1),

    @howmanyAS INT,

    @LeftRightAS CHAR(1) = 'L')

    RETURNS...

  • RE: The Identity Debate

    I've got to say that I'm rapidly going over to the dark side and sticking an Identity column in every table.

    More often than not I can identify a natural key...

  • RE: How to script efficientily on Sql Server 2000?

    I'm amazed that no-one has mentioned this so far, given that they are the sponsor/owner of this site!

    Take a look at SQLCompare from RedGate.

    This has some very nice features, including...

  • RE: Problem in transaction handling in SQL server database

    The other solution you might try would be to look at the locking for the INSERT statement.

    if this was restricted to a ROW level lock (rather than page or table)...

  • RE: O/S partition

    And once again I am struck by the reminder NEVER to let a Network Admin or Sys Admin near my database disks!

    Databases always want LOTS of physical disks.

    Log files should...

  • RE: Rev Your Database

    OK - I'll at my $0.02 to this one!

    The most spectacular instance of "lack of brain" for me occurred a few years ago. We were replacing our 8CPU Alpha servers...

  • RE: Whoops

    While I sympathise with this approach, I think that we are setting a bad example to the future generations of IT Professionals.

    Let me preface the rest of this email by...

  • RE: Read Progress Database Backup

    I hate to nit-pick... but I'm going to anyway!

    Given that this is not a multi-extent database (there is only a db and bi rather than db, d1, b1 etc), the early...

  • RE: Question of the Day for 10 May 2007

    Amusingly, I actually had worked out that it was over budget but decided that since it was the ONLY configuration that gave sufficient usable space it had to be the...

  • RE: Read Progress Database Backup

    This certainly looks like a Progress database. I worked on Progress from 1989 (v4.2) until 2001 (v9.1).

    Progress themselves are still going strong. The other place you may be able to...

  • RE: Question of the Day for 26 Apr 2007

    In THEORY, RAID1 Should outperform RAID5 in reads, as the controller (either SW or HW) could read from either disk to satisfy the request. In the event of a large...

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 154 total)