Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 154 total)
No flame wars please, but in my experience, as a rule of thumb, never never use SAN for databases.
NAS on the other hand is great!
The network stack is not the...
September 24, 2008 at 7:33 pm
Sorry - I never answered that part!
No, not as far as I am aware of!
April 21, 2008 at 6:50 pm
I'm not sure I'm understanding what you need, but lets see if this works!
SELECT table_1.id,table_1.Description, table_2.date1,table_2.date2
FROM table_1
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT table_2.id, MAX(table_2.date1) AS MaxDate1 FROM table_2 GROUP BY table_2.id)...
April 21, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Are you sure about your disc config - Two disks in RAID 5 doesn't sound right to me!
I have to agree that the problem you are seeing is disc queue...
April 21, 2008 at 6:38 pm
I marginally prefer my version... Its a little shorter
Needs comments I know, but the parameters are exactly the same
CREATE FUNCTION fn_MyPadding (
@TextAS VARCHAR(500),
@CharAS CHAR(1),
@howmanyAS INT,
@LeftRightAS CHAR(1) = 'L')
RETURNS...
April 20, 2008 at 10:16 pm
I've got to say that I'm rapidly going over to the dark side and sticking an Identity column in every table.
More often than not I can identify a natural key...
February 10, 2008 at 11:42 pm
I'm amazed that no-one has mentioned this so far, given that they are the sponsor/owner of this site!
Take a look at SQLCompare from RedGate.
This has some very nice features, including...
October 4, 2007 at 12:23 am
The other solution you might try would be to look at the locking for the INSERT statement.
if this was restricted to a ROW level lock (rather than page or table)...
October 3, 2007 at 11:26 pm
And once again I am struck by the reminder NEVER to let a Network Admin or Sys Admin near my database disks!
Databases always want LOTS of physical disks.
Log files should...
September 28, 2007 at 12:57 am
OK - I'll at my $0.02 to this one!
The most spectacular instance of "lack of brain" for me occurred a few years ago. We were replacing our 8CPU Alpha servers...
July 23, 2007 at 10:18 pm
While I sympathise with this approach, I think that we are setting a bad example to the future generations of IT Professionals.
Let me preface the rest of this email by...
July 23, 2007 at 9:59 pm
I hate to nit-pick... but I'm going to anyway!
Given that this is not a multi-extent database (there is only a db and bi rather than db, d1, b1 etc), the early...
May 16, 2007 at 1:23 am
Amusingly, I actually had worked out that it was over budget but decided that since it was the ONLY configuration that gave sufficient usable space it had to be the...
May 16, 2007 at 1:08 am
This certainly looks like a Progress database. I worked on Progress from 1989 (v4.2) until 2001 (v9.1).
Progress themselves are still going strong. The other place you may be able to...
May 13, 2007 at 8:39 pm
In THEORY, RAID1 Should outperform RAID5 in reads, as the controller (either SW or HW) could read from either disk to satisfy the request. In the event of a large...
April 26, 2007 at 12:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 154 total)