Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 106 total)
Ah...of course!
Thanks for pointing this out...I've been staring at this code for longer than I want to admit.
March 24, 2004 at 12:43 pm
I have not tried that, will give it a shot and see if the plan stays updated, thanks.
February 16, 2004 at 6:08 am
Final results:
I modified the code so that the sProc with the SELECT TOP 100... is in a separate stored procedure. This removed the issue of a potential problem with a...
February 11, 2004 at 10:50 am
This problem still plagues me, but I do have additional info.
The sproc contains 4 different SELECT statements that returns different resultsets of the same data based upon a specified input...
January 26, 2004 at 3:06 pm
I understand, however the problem is that it is not being recomplied by SQL Server, I am having to do it manually.
January 9, 2004 at 9:31 am
Thanks, I will try that next time I experience the issue, however - does not MSSQL normally recompile sProcs as the stats change and dictate? I would imagine the problem is...
January 9, 2004 at 8:02 am
Yes, Update Stats is checked for this db.
This is the only sProc that appears to have this issue. I had been under the impression that MSSQL would recompile the sProcs...
January 8, 2004 at 9:53 am
I enjoyed the background and can empathize with many of the issues.
As for your question on notifications -
Just sending the url is fine with me. I always click on that...
December 30, 2003 at 11:57 am
Thanks for the suggestions.
I had not considered one of the variants Gabor suggested. Always helpful to see new ways to accomplish the task. Since performance is not an issue in...
November 3, 2003 at 8:12 am
Your second suggestion with the two tables is a good one I had not considered. I will definitely convert to this as soon as possible (as well as use this...
September 20, 2003 at 3:17 pm
I am using SQL 2000 and the UDF implementation suggested worked fine.
The output is for reporting.
September 19, 2003 at 6:09 pm
Thanks for the feedback, I will give those suggestions a shot.
As for the use of an Integer as a bitmask - I am aware this is not conventional in SQL,...
September 19, 2003 at 8:40 am
Thank you for the reply.
Since the input data is very limited and the first character is unique, the ASCII allowed for simply checking of upper/lower case.
The problem is in the...
July 8, 2003 at 5:53 am
My Thanks for all the great replies.
Any one of which will accomplish my task.
While I am using the RowCount check, the other examples, especially the last one utilzing an index...
June 18, 2003 at 7:37 am
Ah, of course - I had not thought of using RowCount.
Thanks!
June 17, 2003 at 12:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 106 total)