Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)
Actually, in 2005, the solution would probably work if a VARCHAR(MAX) data type was used, which supports up to 2GB of data.
December 7, 2006 at 7:49 am
I agree with that. We use cursors a lot, not for iterating through result sets and performing operations on the data with normal cursors, but for executing business rules. Here...
December 7, 2006 at 6:33 am
Anyone know if SQL Server plans on designing triggers in the future to include the FOR EACH ROW clause like they do in Oracle that allows you to treat your...
December 7, 2006 at 5:47 am
In your situation, it sounds to me like management really meant, "that sounds like a great idea, but I have no idea what you are talking about". It are those...
December 5, 2006 at 6:22 am
I 100% agree with the comment made by Duray AKAR. The query listed will never retrieve the results "the students that has...
August 23, 2006 at 11:21 am
Great article. - Tim Chapman
May 25, 2006 at 7:12 am
Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)