Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 583 total)
Cadavre (9/26/2011)[hr
Good morning and welcome to SSC!
It seems that your DDL script seems to have become detached from your post, or perhaps you were unaware of the benefits of...
September 27, 2011 at 5:57 am
I was originally going to post something saying that the question, which I got right, was needlessly tricky. However, on further reflection, I thought it was perfectly fair. How many...
September 27, 2011 at 5:35 am
Excellent! Just the right amount of grey cell stimulation for an early Monday morning. Thanks.
Great example of taking two simple things you "know" (precedence and conversion) and synthesizing them into...
September 26, 2011 at 5:54 am
Two things missing:
1. Willingness to LISTEN to customer requirements - not give them what you think they need
2. Willingness to spend a little extra time to come up with a...
September 23, 2011 at 5:47 am
Nice example of the question not being more complicated than necessary to demonstrate the point. Thanks for the question.
September 22, 2011 at 5:28 am
Not only a great question, but a superb explanation. Thanks.
September 20, 2011 at 5:27 am
Thanks. Got it right - but almost went for the first instance of the name change. Good thing I kept "parsing". Thanks for the lesson!
September 19, 2011 at 5:43 am
Nice question Carlo! My first thought was, "What am I supposed to learn from this question?" Then I dug in a little deeper. Got it right, but not as quickly...
September 13, 2011 at 5:33 am
Tom.Thomson (9/12/2011)
Thomas Abraham (9/12/2011)
"Always" is what did it for me too - what about not having permission to read from that table?
Can't happen - you always have permission to read...
September 12, 2011 at 7:31 am
cengland0 (9/12/2011)
September 12, 2011 at 6:51 am
paul s-306273 (9/12/2011)
Thomas Abraham (9/12/2011)
BTW, can anyone else see a question for October 14, 2011 in their list of "previous" questions?Yes - I can see it too!
If he's going to...
September 12, 2011 at 5:51 am
Thanks for the question.
BTW, can anyone else see a question for October 14, 2011 in their list of "previous" questions?
September 12, 2011 at 5:39 am
Thanks for a good question. Missed the subquery ORDER BY clause error as I never use ORDER BY in a subquery - expect all results before my final output will...
September 6, 2011 at 6:07 am
Feel a bit deflated at having my streak of correct answers ended by a question like this. Luminaries?
September 6, 2011 at 5:43 am
Almost missed it, using "Features Supported by the Editions of SQL Server 2008" as a reference, since it only mentions Enterprise. Good thing I paused to reflect this morning. Thanks...
September 2, 2011 at 5:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 583 total)