Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 128 total)
900 column table must be having a lot of indexes and a complex primary key. What will happen to Update and Delete performance on such tables?
January 15, 2018 at 11:31 pm
Whatever you are declaring inside your begin try - end try block, does not have any value assigned before insert statement. This is resulting in NULL insertion, thus you are...
December 15, 2017 at 3:19 am
This is generated output. Actual script is like
case when
...
April 15, 2016 at 10:28 am
Thanks Gail for a nice article.
June 8, 2015 at 11:27 pm
nice one, but unnecessary exercise as both will have same plans.
January 16, 2015 at 6:03 am
BrainDonor (1/16/2015)
Can I ask first of all why is the use of NOLOCK compulsory, and are you aware of the potential problems that such a strict rule can cause?
Yes we...
January 16, 2015 at 5:29 am
Thanks to OP for these valuable "Best Practices" that reminded me of my x-manager who was MBA and "nephew of our CEO". :angry:
January 16, 2015 at 5:21 am
Thanks for review.
Yes you are right, these ORs are main issue. Earlier we had few more ORs, and by removing them I managed to get some 40-45% performance gain (I...
October 21, 2014 at 11:33 pm
Thanks Chris.
Yes, I had already tried creating # table as you advised. This was showing lot of improvement in i/o stats as main part was executing only 1 time instead...
June 9, 2014 at 5:07 am
Dear All,
Thanks for your kind support. It was really not easy to write a script specially when requirement is not clear. I made a few changes in suggested queries...
February 4, 2014 at 5:37 am
But you are not inserting anything in #C and @sql is also not declared.
November 11, 2013 at 10:00 pm
Some of us could still help you if you had posted your question properly.
November 11, 2013 at 9:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 128 total)