Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 198 total)
Hi Gents,
I have definately seen this in these forums somewhere before.
All the best
January 7, 2005 at 8:37 am
Hi Eno,
Quick clarification.
Col a Col b
2 2
2 4
5 9
Is this what you require?
January 7, 2005 at 4:44 am
CDO can be quite flaky at times.
Have you tried using Sequels own xp_sendmail instead?
e.g:
exec master.dbo.xp_stopmail
exec master.dbo.xp_startmail
exec master.dbo.xp_sendmail @recipients = @varRecipients, @copy_recipients = @varCopyTo, @message = @varMessage, @subject =...
January 6, 2005 at 8:27 am
Must admit - when I saw AKM's post, that is my intention now. To use EM to create scripts more often and see what its doing in the background.
One little...
January 5, 2005 at 6:01 am
Thats fair enough matey. No surprise really - As long as the job gets done and all that......
Would have expected a warning at least though.
January 5, 2005 at 3:34 am
SELECT TOP 7 *
FROM tblNames
WHERE (PK > 10)
Have Fun
January 4, 2005 at 8:04 am
More Sequel wierdness.....
Had a quick look - If you try to run the code, sure enough you get the error.
Strangely enough, if you go into Entrprise manager, right click the...
January 4, 2005 at 6:52 am
Hi,
Just change the order in which you do things logically - make the column NOT NULL at its initial declaration before you create the index:-
create table test2(a integer NOT NULL,b...
January 4, 2005 at 5:56 am
Hi Max,
"You’ll notice that the Contract Field contains ‘N/A’ and the MNTRVU contains Nulls. So in the Where statements I’ve been using ‘WHERE MNTRVU>0 or MNTRVU>0 and Contract <> 'N/A'’ to...
December 17, 2004 at 5:47 am
Only slightly.
But the person posting the original thread hasn't come back with any form of reply - no feedback or answers to the questions raised.
So, it's only fair that...
December 17, 2004 at 2:46 am
Whenever you use exec, anything used or generated is only available during the lifetime of that exec as it generates a new spid to work in. It cant be accessed...
December 16, 2004 at 10:49 am
Sorry Frank,
The one out of the Bible........
Best regards
December 16, 2004 at 8:20 am
Hi All,
I would like to see a comparison with the original query, the optimised query and the query without the joins - if it isn't too much trouble.
Is there some...
December 16, 2004 at 8:06 am
Sorry to drop this in on you gents......
I only asked because I was asked to re-write a search query that had performance issues and when I changed it from the...
December 16, 2004 at 4:48 am
Seems to fit into this thread so, can anyone tell me why the INNER JOIN is preferred to creating the relationships in the WHERE clause e.g.
SELECT TOP 50 ACC.AccountID,AIN.AccountNumber, ATP.AccountTypeDesc, BOR.FullName,
BPH.PH1Phone,BPH.PH2Phone,BAD.ADD1Address1,BAD.ADD1Address2,
BAD.ADD1City,BAD.ADD1State,BAD.ADD1Postal,...
December 16, 2004 at 4:17 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 198 total)