Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)
The Access97 Upsizing Wizard is to be avoided, as sqlWannabee illustrates with his mention of the trigger vs. DRI (declared referential integrity) approach. And, he is steering you correctly...
July 24, 2008 at 11:49 pm
I notice that you are pulling Oracle via SS2K.
Perhaps you have created a linked server which implies OLEDB [openquery()]which begs the question: which OLEDB provider are you using?...
July 24, 2008 at 11:21 pm
My opinion is/was based on statements by a handful of Access MVPs.
Perhaps they were too circumspect. I shouldn't say it can't be done.
Upon reflection, it seems to...
July 24, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Thanks for the correction. How embarrassing? Very.
I hope Michael doesn't see it.
May 16, 2008 at 5:13 pm
'As my friends say, be careful what you ask him [me].'
I think the answer to your question is in the tea leaves.
The SS team may have improved ado...
May 15, 2008 at 6:07 pm
It only captures tables (and the associated defaults, constraints, indexes, etc.) and queries. You can get set it to create the links if you include both the front end...
May 6, 2008 at 6:16 pm
I think I mentioned earlier (not sure if in this thread), no you can't count on the ACCESS Upsizing Wizard or the SQL Server Import Wizard to capture everything. ...
May 2, 2008 at 4:34 pm
If the query that is joining the tables is read-only (not to update either table), I think you would find that a pass-through query would allow the join on the...
May 1, 2008 at 3:06 pm
I should preface this with the admission that I am biased toward using linked tables via MDBs over using ADPs.
BE AWARE: this is a religious issue among some and my...
April 30, 2008 at 3:43 pm
I believe that msg is telling you that your destination database must be hosted on an instance of SQL2005. If you are trying to connect to sql express and...
April 30, 2008 at 2:17 pm
Actually, you mean SQL Server 2005, not 2007, just for clarity.
The Net Start results imply you are running something more advanced than sql express. These:
SQL SERVER ANALYSIS
...
April 29, 2008 at 10:27 am
Yes. You have it: version 8.x implies one of the versions of the SQL Server 2000 engine. The actual pattern following the '8.' indicates which version and which...
April 29, 2008 at 1:12 am
OK.
I think I can reconcile this for you.
The key is the "Microsoft ... Desktop Engine". This is usually abbreviated to 'MSDE' and is the predecessor to Sql...
April 25, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Yup, out-of-range dates are a principal upsize killer.
In SQL2008, this is/will be somwhat less problematical as it will provide new date (and time) datatypes that will subsume all reasonable date...
April 25, 2008 at 12:20 pm
To avoid the problem of Access pulling all records and filtering on the client side, use "pass-through" queries. These do the filtering/sorting on the sql side (warp speed) and...
April 24, 2008 at 7:00 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)