Yes and i get the same response. Have narrowed it down to one database now.

Any ideas? Thanks for the response.

Certainly this can be done and it not that hard. There ar e the obligitory pre-reqs and you should read MS articles on the subject:

One of the main...

A stupid question really. Especially given MS's liking for disk-hungry apps.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/224071

Take backups first.

Alvin Ramard (11/17/2008)

---

Is there more "stuff" save to Sharepoint than should be? Are there multiple copies that could be delete? Can anything be archived or deleted,...

I really do...

What that there is something that Gail doesnt know? Yeah im surprised to. My confidence is shaken but my hero-worship is far to strong. Gail...

Mike (11/13/2008)

---

Is there anyway to control the size of it? Its just growing and growing and growing and eating up my server space.

Is like a worm that just...

GilaMonster (11/13/2008)

---

Every database should have this on in SQL 2000. In 2005 it's been replaced by page checksums which should be used instead.

It's a way for SQL to detect that...

This shouldnt be a problem for you. SQL 2005 clusters very easily. Like MarkusB said, make sure you have second failover group and the virtual-instance name is different and you...

Is this to be a scheduled repeatable job? If so the simplest way is to use the ssms to create a...

It could be differences in the paths stored within excel to object within AD where AD structure differs from Novell.

Though to be honest I'm just t aking a wild stab....

When attaching the db in the new server you will just need to specify (re-locate) the individual files (mdf and ldf).

Should be fine after that. 🙂

I have seen it before that when doing an operation like this (using method 2), once the services are down, they dont easily come up. Suggest method 1!

rbarryyoung (11/12/2008)

---

Crude'ness :rolleyes: