Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 296 total)
I would allocate a chunk of space based on projections for the next couple of years. This way the db would not auto grow.
You can setup alerts to email you when your...
March 13, 2006 at 6:15 am
Look in msdb database
March 8, 2006 at 9:04 am
You can use the generate sql script wizard from SQL 2k.
Alternately, you can delete all the dummy data and backup and restore the database. You will need to resync...
March 3, 2006 at 2:51 pm
We are being recommended to use DB Connect to connect to the mainframe. Is this the same as ODBC?
February 28, 2006 at 5:27 pm
What about the query execution plan??? Does this create only one plan or more than one (based on the number of ;numbers within the procedure)
February 10, 2006 at 1:26 pm
In our application we use AFTER triggers to maintain an audit trail. We need to maintain a history of changes to the data. We know that this causes a huge...
November 29, 2005 at 8:12 am
I thought so myself. What I got though is one BBF file which i didnt think would be good for my purposes.
I think this is definitely a backup or a...
July 6, 2005 at 7:56 am
I tried that but it didnt work for me.
The data in the Select statement would pull in the order specified but would not update in the order required.
April 7, 2005 at 7:59 am
I am trying to replace a fast_forward cursor. When we migrate clients we have to update abt 20k+ transactions and it took abt 35 minutes for abt 10k transactions. The...
April 5, 2005 at 8:12 pm
The LookUp table essentially has the same records on both servers the Data table has 50 fewer records on the test server. Another thing that caught my eye is that...
September 17, 2004 at 7:32 am
I changed the indexes on the table and this is new reading for the execution plan.
Table 'tblLookUp'. Scan count 289, logical reads 294, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0.
Table 'tblData'....
September 16, 2004 at 9:45 am
Closely looking at the execution plan
The Clustered Index Scan for a Look Up table is costing 0% on the test server while the same table is taking 4% on the...
September 15, 2004 at 11:10 am
The execution plan is the same for both the servers.
Would physical disk fragmentation be responsible for this?
Thanks
September 15, 2004 at 10:02 am
Thank-you. I have registered with Prometric but i guess i can change to VUE with this code.
September 1, 2004 at 11:20 am
Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 296 total)