Viewing 14 posts - 31 through 44 (of 44 total)
aaah, that explains the table that never replicated then, its the only one with no PK, thanks for the info 🙂
April 4, 2013 at 6:10 am
So I've followed the first SSC stairway step for replication to make sure i did everything correct, did it on a dev box with a test DB and some of...
April 4, 2013 at 3:11 am
Thanks for the reply opc. I had briefly thought about something like you suggested but figured the replication method would be faster (less downtime) as it should only require...
April 4, 2013 at 1:02 am
Thank you Anthony, very helpful 🙂
And the attached whitepaper looks pretty in-depth!
February 18, 2013 at 2:20 am
honza.mf (11/1/2012)
Ross.M (11/1/2012)
November 1, 2012 at 5:29 am
honza.mf (11/1/2012)
derek.colley (11/1/2012)
November 1, 2012 at 4:24 am
Carlo Romagnano (9/26/2012)
If all the rows get matched then the query will act as a cross join.
I think the explanation is incomplete and inaccurate.
INNER JOIN returns number of rows from...
September 26, 2012 at 6:52 am
I think c was not actively looking but open to wild offers:
I saw a great quote recently on a LinkedIn profile: " I'm not actively looking for a new position....
June 1, 2012 at 1:57 am
Lynn Pettis (5/31/2012)
I would go with separate stored procedures. Each one should do a single function, get or insert.
What's your reasoning behind this though? Don't get me wrong,...
May 31, 2012 at 10:25 am
Ahh ok, I've never connected to excel with SSRS but in a previous job we did have problems with the SSRS user not having access to network drives when it...
May 14, 2012 at 10:36 am
Not sure if this will work or not but have you tried sharing the excel doc? (Review tab > Share Workbook)
May 14, 2012 at 10:19 am
Works fine for me:
DECLARE@DBName NVARCHAR(50),
@DYNSQL NVARCHAR(MAX)
SET@DBName = 'master'
SET@DYNSQL = 'USE ' + @DBName + ' SELECT name AS [File Name] , physical_name AS [Physical Name], size/128.0 AS [Total Size in...
May 10, 2012 at 7:47 am
Can be? It is always faster. See my previous post for details.
I'm just quoting the official Oracle documentation, see the link.
May 2, 2012 at 5:07 am
Removing rows with the TRUNCATE statement can be faster than removing all rows with the DELETE statement, especially if the table has numerous triggers, indexes, and other dependencies.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_10006.htm
May 2, 2012 at 3:48 am
Viewing 14 posts - 31 through 44 (of 44 total)