Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

  • RE: Outer Join – What am I missing (SQL Spackle)

    Another set of interesting stats. When I run the queries minus the ORDER BY clause and select only the count(*) as with your conditions I get the following:

    -- ...

  • RE: Outer Join – What am I missing (SQL Spackle)

    Hmmm! Good points. ...and thank you for a very good and rather thorough explanation of the issues around testing "apples to apples".

    My main point was that...

  • RE: Outer Join – What am I missing (SQL Spackle)

    @deroby,

    Don't feel bad. In fact I think it's very important to explain to newbies that while this is an example of where LEFT OUTER JOIN can be...

  • RE: The Flaws of Choice

    Einstein gave us good advice when he said:

    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler".

    Design is an exercise in making things only as complex as...

  • RE: Tracer Token

    Please correct me if I'm wrong Mohan but I think the way this would be used is by inspecting the results and increasing the query timeout to a value greater...

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    If you went through the thread you should have noticed that the "while loop" doesn't buy you much if anything. The objective is to replace the cursor with...

  • RE: Need Udf for next sequential key operation

    All,

    Sorry for taking so long to respond to your comments.  They are greatly appreciated.  I've been working 100+ hours per week on this project and don't get a lot of...

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    There is always more than one way to solve a problem.  While my personal bias is toward set based solutions for the many reasons posted here, RD Francis and others have...

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    I would not "categorically refuse to even consider using (cursors)".  I would simply say that it should be a last resort.  I can't think of any good reason why you...

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    The original code for SQL Server was developed by Sybase. Microsoft, Ashton-Tate and Sybase collaborated on the first version of SQL Server (4.2) built for OS2 in the late 1980's...

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    Great discussion!  As usual there are many ways to solve a problem and each of us has to determine based on our own experience how best to analyze...

  • RE: Why Upgrade?

    Point of clarification: I meant to say that dynamic query optimization is lost "for the CLR stored procedure" This is because it is a compiled assembly sitting...

  • RE: Why Upgrade?

    Andy speaks the truth!  The conventional "wisdom" regarding limitations on data capacity is just industry inertia.  No one wants to fix what ain't broken.  But since SQL Server 2000 size...

  • RE: Problem installing SQL 2005 SEPT CTP

    Thanks for the tip on using the Tools for Disc 2.  That worked great but now I can't get the management tools to install.  The installation fails with the following...

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)