Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 49 total)
I used a 2016 CTP2 client to manage a CTP3 server, once I upgraded the client all was well! I spent a little time checking what had changed and it...
November 10, 2015 at 12:29 pm
The field that you are COUNT()'ing, is there a possibility it contains NULLs?
February 7, 2012 at 2:42 am
I would suggest backup to disk for these two reasons:
1. Backup time faster
2. Restore time faster
You can replicate these backupps to tape outside of the SQL Backup process and store...
February 7, 2012 at 2:36 am
You have answered your own question really, you have only 1 GB unallocated so this is all you can reduce the size by.
January 25, 2012 at 9:18 am
Did you restart the instance?
January 25, 2012 at 8:16 am
This is allowed. The restriction is you are not allowed to use the development server to serve data to production applications / clients. Loading data from live to development is...
January 25, 2012 at 8:10 am
Just when you want dynamic columns. I dont see why Microsoft cant further develop PIVOT to remove the need to use dynamic SQL in this situation. :discuss:
January 24, 2012 at 8:30 am
Generally speaking a shrink of the database should not be performed under usual circumstances for this reason. Find the route cause and go from there vs a shrink of the...
January 24, 2012 at 8:23 am
As I already posted. Did you follow the renaming process as per the documentation from Microsoft:
January 24, 2012 at 7:02 am
Generally the advantage of a denormalised table (or flat table as you call it) is read speed as you are not joining to other tables. Normalisation is for...
January 24, 2012 at 5:45 am
Try RESTORE WITH STANDBY?
January 23, 2012 at 9:35 am
Renaming the virtual server name is no problem:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178083.aspx
As for renaming the instance name itself, this is not possible as far as I can see, or it is by...
January 23, 2012 at 6:07 am
padhis (1/20/2012)
exec sp_msforeachdb 'if db_id(''?'')>4 backup database [?] to disk = ''C:\?.bak'' with init, compression;'
Does the same thing but isn't support by Microsoft
January 20, 2012 at 9:06 am
No it does it straight to the destination path.
January 20, 2012 at 8:55 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 49 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy