Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
This is slightly off-topic, but you may also want to consider simply using instancing if you're unsure of going with a VM environment. Lately I've come across many clients who...
May 4, 2011 at 10:52 am
So I've been doing some digging. Apparently everytime you run this system stored procedure, it creates an entry in msdb..sysreplicationalerts.
However, in this particular case, it did not create a record...
May 4, 2011 at 8:31 am
It can cause some trouble, but it can be done. My recommendation would be to use some sort of intelligent means of managing your indexes. Only rebuild indexes that need...
December 3, 2010 at 11:47 am
Thanks Gail, that is exactly the information that I was looking for.
I will play around with a piecemeal restore with files/filegroups sometime.
The backup time is far longer than expected. Looking...
December 1, 2010 at 1:35 pm
SAN, and the SAN is configured in such a way that there may be little or not performance benefit from arranging files on different volumes.
From the documentation from our vendor:
"It...
December 1, 2010 at 9:34 am
Ahh, I see the problem now. It seems I have an untyped XML data type on that table.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms184277.aspx
This would be my problem.
Use typed xml data type in the following...
November 18, 2010 at 4:06 pm
In a nutshell, I'm already doing that. I'm passing a recordset object to my ForEachLoop. The ForEachLoop processes each record and assigns them to a variable.
Edit:
From further research the problem...
June 23, 2010 at 2:28 pm
You can configure the job to "go to next step on failure" instead of "quit the job reporting failure"
June 23, 2010 at 1:17 pm
Thank you, da-zero. That worked perfectly!
June 22, 2010 at 8:33 am
Good feedback, thanks.
I think my biggest battle would be convincing others here to expand C drive volumes. These are going to be local physical arrays of RAID 1 and likely...
June 16, 2010 at 11:06 am
That looks like a really ugly bit of comparison. You most certainly are going to have a difficult time joining that data with a decent level of performance. You're going...
May 19, 2010 at 2:37 pm
Thanks guys! That will be very helpful for me moving forward.
May 19, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Hmm, I'd hate to say it ... but it might be a good idea for you to consider having a dedicated disk drive for SQL use. In some of my...
May 7, 2010 at 11:09 am
One thing you may want to do is change the memory allocation of your SQL instance. By default it will claim as much memory as you will allow it.
On my...
May 7, 2010 at 7:16 am
We had a gig or two of free space in the data file before I dropped this table. I then dropped the table and then looked to see how...
May 6, 2010 at 2:40 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)