Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Yes, the restore is automated. However we're using Veritas for this function so I can't say for sure that you could do it with native SQL Server tools.
And yes,...
September 27, 2005 at 10:56 pm
RS 2000 doesn't support this feature natively, but I found someone that has implemented an extension to RS that does:
http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/21214/1954?pf=true
As far as SQL 2005, its hard for me...
September 14, 2005 at 12:41 pm
We have six servers in a poor man's high-availability setup:
(2) SQL servers
(2) web/portal servers
(2) file servers
One SQL server is primary and serves up database queries for the active web server....
September 14, 2005 at 12:27 pm
Yikes! 5GB! Well, if you can't figure out how to make it smaller...
What about storing it in ROLAP mode instead of MOLAP? That way you can use...
September 14, 2005 at 12:13 pm
That's a really big cube! Why is it so big? How many dimensions and levels? Is there really that much dimensional info, or are you actually storing detail-level data in...
September 14, 2005 at 11:33 am
I assume you are doing this from Analysis Manager? What service pack are you running? You should be at least at SP3 of both SQL Server 2000 and of Analysis Services...
September 14, 2005 at 11:26 am
Could it be that you're using a user-based DSN in your connection, and that DSN is not available to the user account running SQL Server?
As a side note, I find...
September 14, 2005 at 11:18 am
I don't know if it would be any faster (depends on resulting execution plans, table sizes, etc), but what I've done in the past is just set the max error...
September 14, 2005 at 11:12 am
You've got the classic DTS oops - point-and-click ease, but poorly designed ETL. DTS (in SQL 2000) is great for putting together stuff quick, but it doesn't provide an automatic framework...
September 14, 2005 at 11:06 am
Sounds lilke you're running out of swap space! This is what we call a Bad Thing in the world of ETL. You can verify this is the condition you're experiencing...
September 14, 2005 at 10:58 am
that's why i use unix shell commands to do pre-parsing, its a lot more flexible. but try this to get what you want:
type TestData.txt | find "DETAIL" >TestData_Detail.txt
i don't know...
September 14, 2005 at 10:38 am
I just had to deal with this myself. I find that a lot of simple text-based manipulation and filtering is most easily done with batch scripts BEFORE I bring them...
September 13, 2005 at 5:41 pm
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)