Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 361 total)
Try looking in here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966413.aspx
Looks like a handy whitepaper "SQL Server 2005 Waits and Queues SQL Server Best Practices Article"
November 16, 2009 at 9:32 am
Great question - anyone got any info beyond BOL?
eg: ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v10/MS.SQLSVR.v10.en/s10de_6tsql/html/568d89ed-2c96-4795-8a0c-2f3e375081da.htm
November 16, 2009 at 6:36 am
Hi Dirk
Not knowing the details, I would really want to ask why you think that is what you want to do.
Without you knowing it, you are probably in a fortunate...
November 16, 2009 at 6:27 am
Model is the "model" for all user created databases. Stick anything in it - users, procs,tables etc and they will appear in all subsequent databases you create. Presumably if...
October 21, 2009 at 4:51 am
haha, someone should submit that to the daily wtf... :hehe:
September 22, 2009 at 3:19 am
I guess its because people tend to evaluate 'true' things first, especially in IF clauses.
What we have here is a double negative, which requires more consideration and work through than
if...
September 16, 2009 at 4:11 am
As long as it's not you getting canned when it goes wrong... Let the sysadmins carry it. That way when they get binned, you can negotiate a nice little...
September 14, 2009 at 4:48 am
Tricksy tricksy.
Good question, good follow up.
Learned something new today.
ta
September 4, 2009 at 4:48 am
Is your grouping sets example not just a rework of rollup?
Is the power of this not in the way it can handle non hierarchical (ie group by col1, col2, col3...
August 27, 2009 at 4:21 am
GilaMonster (6/22/2009)
RichardB (6/22/2009)
and the ever irritating dtproperties.
Oh, right, the database diagrams table. I believe to get rid of those you need to filter using ObjectProperty with the IsMSShipped property. I...
June 22, 2009 at 7:15 am
and the ever irritating dtproperties.
June 22, 2009 at 5:12 am
GilaMonster (6/22/2009)
Actually, for SQL 2005 the easiest way is to use sys.tables.
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sys.tables
Which is fine, as long as you remember that it also includes the occasional system table.
June 22, 2009 at 4:40 am
How about the futute though? Do many of you picture yourselves as DBA's in another 10/20 years time?
Got to be honest, not sure that gets me excited!...
June 15, 2009 at 10:58 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 361 total)