Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 107 total)

  • RE: Poor performance

    Well I can tell you I am very relieved it is now running at that speed, we now need to transfer all of the users onto that machine...

  • RE: Should I use # tables?

    Shouldn't you use table variables rather than temp tables? Or are there disadvantages to using table variables?

    From BOL it says the following:-

    table variables used in stored procedures result in fewer...

  • RE: Poor performance

    Well we moved our ETL code onto a new machine.

    This machine is the same processor/memory specification but has 6 15,000 RPM disks ( 300Gb each) setup as RAID-10.

    The load on...

  • RE: Monitoring UDF

    I don't have a URL, but to use SQL Profiler do the following:-

    1) Start / Programs / Microsoft SQL Server>/Profiler

    2) file / new trace

    3) login to SQL server

    4) Select...

  • RE: Monitoring UDF

    SQL Profiler?

  • RE: Performance problems on Live server

    Hi,

    Have you tried running SQL Profiler on the server when the process is running. To confirm the statements you are expecting to run are in fact running.

    Have you also run...

  • RE: is there any difference between != and <>

    I think they are the same

    Pete

  • RE: Reporting Tables (Denormalize tables)

    I agree, a reporting solution is not usually compatibile with transactional solution as the amount of data each are using is different. For example a large report may read 1...

  • RE: Poor performance

    Thanks for the link, I will have a good read of it when I am at home, as it is very detailed...

  • RE: Reporting Tables (Denormalize tables)

    The objective of denomralising tables, is to reduce the number of joins to tables. Transactional tables are normalised and designed for speed of writing small amounts of data to the...

  • RE: Poor performance

    I think I have solved the issue with the index creation.... It seemed that the clustered index was becoming fragmented as each update was being run, this then caused new...

  • RE: Poor performance

    HI Bob,

    The Physical Disk:Queue Length performance monitor shows between 10-167 when the process is running which indicates to me that the disk subsystem is being thrashed as I beleive the...

  • RE: Poor performance

    The insert was much slower. Although I didn't measure the updates after the insert.

  • RE: Unstable plan

    Hi, Have you tried updating the statistics on the tables you are querying?

    Pete

  • RE: Poor performance

    Dropping all the indexes prior to the insert and then running the insert and then creating the clustered index produces this output....

    DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'TRANSFORM_JOB_COST' table...

    Table: 'TRANSFORM_JOB_COST' (754101727); index ID:...

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 107 total)