Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 183 total)
>> The adequacy of NULLs has been a hotly debated topic since the beginning, even among the most seasoned veteran SQL Academics and DBAs, including the likes of Chris Date,...
February 24, 2006 at 8:57 am
If you are enforcing business rules outside of the DBMS, then you have poorly designed your database, or don't fully understand what a database is.
Your conceptual model (or business model)...
February 16, 2006 at 2:29 am
>> it doesn't always hold true for legacy systems. In the latter, most logical models remain well after the person who made the business rule has moved on or changed priorities. ...
February 15, 2006 at 5:03 am
Not quite but nearly... business rules that form your business model, which forms your logical model, are enforced by the DBMS.
Such things as "when someone does this, or tries to do...
February 14, 2006 at 10:19 am
Your business model (including business rules) drives your logical model (i.e. the database implementation) and thus the "principles behind that model" should be one and the same.
In your zero-balance example,...
February 14, 2006 at 9:41 am
You need PKs and FKs in a proper database design, so why not implement them in the DBMS? What do you gain that outweighs what you are losing? The idea is...
February 14, 2006 at 7:29 am
(Bump)
Is there anyone else in the UK that is interested in this? Thanks.
February 8, 2006 at 4:16 am
>> Please replace it with one of those mind-reading ones as soon as possible. <<
That would be quite amusing actually. Given that you can "censor" your own thoughts when typing,...
February 3, 2006 at 6:28 am
>> When you send out a communication from your company, email, fax, or even phone these days with Caller ID, you are representing that company. And your interactions and dealings...
February 3, 2006 at 4:04 am
Now if you want a fast car, look no further than the Bugatti Veyron.
Featured recently on BBC's Top Gear, it is now...
January 27, 2006 at 4:06 am
>> The reason i was working on some alternate value is 'NULL' breaks the boolean logic. <<
You're trying to apply a value from 3-valued logic (NULL) to 2-valued logic. ...
January 16, 2006 at 2:40 am
OK, I've heard back.
I mentioned the two subjects you'd suggested, Mark, and he said on this:
"Good choice. These are new and revised works with some new positions. This will take...
January 10, 2006 at 8:16 am
Thanks for the reply, Mark. I'd agree on your choice of subjects. I'm also very interested in his proposals for missing values (and have read his paper "The Final NULL...
January 10, 2006 at 5:02 am
>>Midget-naked-mud-wrestling channel<<
That probably exists!
>>I've had BSkyB for 4 years but it has occurred to me that with the exception of 24 virtually everything...
January 9, 2006 at 4:42 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 183 total)