Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 95 total)
george sibbald (4/15/2011)
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188388(SQL.90).aspx
in the maxdop section -
'Parallel index operations are available only in SQL Server 2005...
April 15, 2011 at 7:17 am
But I can't imagine that microsoft limit the processors on index rebuilds but if you say so. However I would test it. But by the way, I have noticed that...
April 15, 2011 at 5:45 am
Mr. Holio (4/15/2011)
thought it was 4 and express supports only 1.. :unsure:
You'r right. Here is the evidence from a "trusted" source ... 🙂
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143760%28v=SQL.100%29.aspx
April 15, 2011 at 4:12 am
Hi,
it is the same value in sql server and in system monitor. Only if in the sys view with the performance counters a counter exists with a base ending, you...
April 14, 2011 at 11:18 pm
@alzdba: But could this be the reason if the sql server has performance issues? The server has 7 GB free physical memory.
April 14, 2011 at 1:25 pm
No, usually not.
Have you checked the disk performance of the sql server? Wait time? Read/Write Bytes / sec? Reads/Writes / sec?
So we should be sure what the source of the...
April 14, 2011 at 1:03 pm
First, has sql server the AWE flag enabled although it is a 64-bit machine?
I have looked at the results:
Target Server Memory and Total Server Memory is the same -> that's...
April 14, 2011 at 7:15 am
Hi,
tell me about the server? what server is it? Are some other services running on this server? what storage the server use? Is it virtualized? Are there running other databases...
April 13, 2011 at 2:39 pm
Thanks Grant. We can't learn enough ... 😉
April 13, 2011 at 6:24 am
That's true, this would be also an indicator. Thanks Craig.
You can take the following statement:
selectcntr_value as [PageLifeExpectancyInSeconds]
fromsys.dm_os_performance_counters
whereobject_name like '%:Buffer Manager%'
and counter_name like 'Page life expectancy%'
If the value falls below 300...
April 13, 2011 at 5:49 am
Sounds mysterious ... 😎
April 13, 2011 at 5:41 am
In nearly all cases the disk is the bottleneck and if you set up a replication to a database which is located on another disk it would really increase the...
April 13, 2011 at 5:39 am
But you haven't seen any errors in the event log?
April 13, 2011 at 5:27 am
ramanan_iyer (4/13/2011)
Thanks again for your prompt response.
I have some experience with SQL Replication around 5 years back, thanks for the hint will do a trial again.
We have transactional replication...
April 13, 2011 at 5:17 am
Yes, if you only want to take a copy of these 2 tables you can use replication (the best fit in your case would be a transactional replication). In this...
April 13, 2011 at 4:37 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 95 total)