Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 52 total)
Huh, I always assumed that we did run AV on the server boxes. Went to check, and it appears that we don't. It doesn't alarm me, since the servers are...
February 9, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Lynn Pettis (2/9/2009)
Olga B (2/9/2009)
February 9, 2009 at 12:03 pm
Great article. The best thing about the suggested approach is that if the poster takes the time to define the problem and consider the test data and the desired output,...
February 9, 2009 at 11:24 am
A simple solution would be to make a history reports that saves the previous reports totals and redisplays them... then the export becomes a breeze.
Or the user can always copy...
December 9, 2008 at 2:00 pm
I do think Prometheus is an apt comparison. Some days, you feel like you bring fire into the dark corners of the organization and make things better and brighter. Other...
September 25, 2008 at 9:58 am
I'm getting this error message on the backup job that ran happily for over two months. It's backup only on a bunch of databases, no integrity checks or optimization, no...
August 29, 2008 at 11:36 am
Not an oxymoron, but I cracked up when a consultant used "we will reach out to you" to mean they would email the meeting minutes.
August 21, 2008 at 10:32 am
Wayne West (7/25/2008)
July 25, 2008 at 10:39 am
The list of answers was incomplete!:hehe: Here, a backup failed (although for a perfectly logical reason and I was able to rerun it).
June 13, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Excellent question. I learned something useful.
One application of OVER that seems to have potential (note hedging 😉 ) is that it allows applying aggregate function to more than one different...
May 13, 2008 at 12:06 pm
That's great!
Er... is "ask" a noun now? Is "request" being discontinued? 😉
February 20, 2008 at 5:27 pm
What about adding computed columns to a view and running reports on a view? No increased data size and easier reporting.
February 14, 2008 at 5:01 pm
I may have gotten it wrong if the question were not sponsored. 😉
October 30, 2007 at 12:21 pm
OK, this is a corrected version of the query, which works with 0, 1, 2, or more ~s in the column. The select returns everything after the second to last...
August 22, 2007 at 11:43 am
But looks like I am. How on Earth did I miss it?
Anyway, thanks for sharing the solution.
August 6, 2007 at 5:19 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 52 total)