Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Hallo matt,
matt stockham (11/16/2007)
I think your alternative would probably work as well as anything ... could you include the records to be deleted into the XML files?
yes...
November 20, 2007 at 12:18 am
matt stockham (11/15/2007)
Is there a good reason to only use XML files? Replication might be a good way to solve the problem (the details will decide which type).
The main...
November 16, 2007 at 12:28 am
Thank you all for your responses. Now I can make a better decision based on your feedback.
October 4, 2007 at 4:35 am
I must keep the data in the same table since I have Offline Distributed Databases and the only way to comunicate (till now) it's via XML files where I send...
December 21, 2006 at 8:42 am
Hi Mark, you are right, but that way I need to create a Mirror "Deleted" Table for all tables where I want to have this logic.
That's why I prefered to...
December 21, 2006 at 8:16 am
I get it now. Good idea!
That should also solve the issue about unique contraints on col_2 and col3 as mentioned above.
I can create a unique contraint on col_2 + col_3...
December 21, 2006 at 8:02 am
Hi peterhe,
I understand what you meant with the unique columns (col_2 and col_3).
But what do you mean with:
>>A better solution is to use int for IsDeleted and take the...
December 21, 2006 at 7:50 am
Thanks a lot for the interesting article.
December 19, 2006 at 7:50 am
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)