Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
Oh wow. I'd have never thought of checking the collation. Thanks for the article and the good reminder. Headed off now to check the collation on my...
April 11, 2011 at 8:21 am
Sorry LP -- I just had a nice big explanation with examples, and this damn website took it and tossed it. Now I'm pissed. I can't even go...
May 21, 2009 at 1:01 pm
LP (5/21/2009)
May 21, 2009 at 10:02 am
Thanks Phil. I looked into that operation, too. The "catch" is that the one table is already in order that matches the "row number" column of the second...
April 22, 2009 at 9:30 am
The large tables in this project don't grow, so long as our purging jobs complete in a timely manner. We keep about 500,000 Windows computer inventories in this database....
April 7, 2009 at 9:35 am
Despite having shrunk the index from 11,335,830 to 387,849 pages (a reduction of 83.5Gb in 8k pages), I've only been able to sequeeze out a few Gb of disk space...
April 6, 2009 at 9:36 am
Thanks. I'll give that a shot now.
April 2, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Matt Miller (5/27/2008)
within SSMS: Tools, Options, Scripting. Set the extended properties to FALSE, and enable scripting the permissions. These set the default scripting options.
Uhhhhh .... I don't have Scripting...
May 28, 2008 at 9:49 am
For IP address manipulation, we store them as BIGINTs. We have two UDFs; one that encodes an IP address as a BIGINT and one that converts back. Information...
December 19, 2006 at 11:40 am
Ref. the example I gave above ... handles this very nicely. And, if you use VARxxx columns, it's not *overly* wasteful. Still not as small as a BIT...
December 15, 2006 at 7:26 am
"Hmmm, let's see; column A547DD tracks the OS while columns A547DE tracks cookies. Piece of cake." I think not.
I can see where you're coming from now ... 'cause it's easier...
December 13, 2006 at 5:20 pm
Of course the big drawback to this type of data encoding is that you have to completely decode it before you can do anything meaningful with it. This means...
December 13, 2006 at 2:10 pm
There is one significant (potential) problem with this query. Max(emp_id), max(fname), max(lname) and max(job_lvl) could all be from different rows in the table; they're _probably_ not going to be...
June 30, 2005 at 8:12 am
Additionally, we remove the local Administrators group from the SQL Server's Server Administrators role. This keeps our system admins from messing with the SQL server stuff (or snooping!).
June 29, 2005 at 8:36 am
Searching for a single argument across 55 columns is going to be ugly, no matter how you do it. Most likely, you're wanting to do use a LIKE '%something-to-look-for%'...
September 30, 2004 at 8:08 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)