Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 55 total)
Thanks Phil,
As you say, it's not elegant, but it seems to work for me. I was checking if there was a better way, but this does the job so i'll...
July 22, 2022 at 7:11 am
Phil, yes my ERP has the PK/FK information but D365 generates new ones when creating its records (my ones get saved into a separate field for reference). I think that...
July 15, 2022 at 6:45 am
Thanks Jeffrey,
Based on what you're suggesting I might have thought that since the logon process has to work through all relevant groups then it would do so in a set...
February 17, 2022 at 8:53 am
Random selection... that's what seems to be happening.
Do you know if Microsoft document that anywhere as I have been unable to find it?
February 16, 2022 at 8:06 am
Looks like I needed to amend the collation of the subscriber db (dbS) to match that of the publisher (dbP) as after I did that and reinitialised the snapshot the...
October 12, 2021 at 1:04 pm
Michael,
I think that you're agreeing with me that the automatic download, deployment and installation is not a good idea for SQL updates. I like the sound of using SCCM though...
March 4, 2020 at 4:18 pm
In my research I've seen a solution to what you describe posted by Adam Bertram. Essentially he verifies a CU or SP and drops it into a predefined folder...
March 4, 2020 at 4:16 pm
I do indeed have multiple versions as some of these are dictated by my 3rd party vendors. There is a risk with any version though as not all CUs seem...
March 4, 2020 at 2:59 pm
It's been a while since I last updated this thread and have to report that I was unsuccessful in recovering the corrupt database. The team responsible for it eventually ported...
April 4, 2019 at 11:03 am
Yes, this is a SharePoint content database and not the 8964 errors are not the only ones being reported from a CHECKBD.
Unfortunately I've already tried a DBCC CHECKDB ('SP_Teams_02',...
November 16, 2018 at 12:53 am
I typically don't do the PHYSICAL_ONLY checks on my db's - perhaps I should, but in the case reported this is another teams and they don't do checks at all.
November 15, 2018 at 6:38 am
I've attached a copy of the results after running DBCC CHECKDB ('SP_Teams_02') WITH NO_INFOMSGS, ALL_ERRORMSGS;
against the production server as that shows slightly different results to the 'test'...
November 15, 2018 at 6:21 am
November 15, 2018 at 6:09 am
Here are the results of running:DBCC CHECKDB ('SP_Teams_02_Corrupt') WITH NO_INFOMSGS, ALL_ERRORMSGS;
against the 'test' SQL instance db having already had a REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS action run against it.
November 15, 2018 at 5:18 am
Ok, you've convinced me - I'll switch back to registered servers.
I started using them a while ago and liked the ability to run a script on multiple servers in...
August 17, 2018 at 8:23 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 55 total)