Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 118 total)
rhythm.varshney (12/10/2012)
Nice question.However it will fetch error in SQL 2005 not sure about upper version as we can not assign value while declaration.
+1
December 10, 2012 at 7:45 am
If the banker's rule was involved, then the code below should return 3.4 and 3.6 - instead, it returned 3.5 and 3.5.
declare @x float, @y float;
set @x = 3.45;
set @y...
November 20, 2012 at 6:26 am
The banker's rounding rule is completely unrelated to today's question. What you see in this question is that float cannot represent the .65 fraction in a finite amount of binary...
November 20, 2012 at 6:24 am
Thanks for this question. I always hated/never understood this banker's rounding rule. As you can see from this post it is not just in Sql
Like others...
November 19, 2012 at 6:34 am
The first argument is an expression where those unbound column names refer to the row that leads the current row by the number which the second argument evaluates to....
November 13, 2012 at 7:57 am
L' Eomot Inversé (11/12/2012)
mbova407 (11/12/2012)
Will someone please explain example C in english
CREATE TABLE T (a int, b int, c int);
GO
INSERT INTO T VALUES (1, 1, -3),...
November 13, 2012 at 7:56 am
Thanks for the question
Will someone please explain example C in english
CREATE TABLE T (a int, b int, c int);
GO
INSERT INTO T VALUES (1, 1, -3), (2, 2, 4), (3,...
November 12, 2012 at 6:05 am
I guess I don't understand the question. How is using cross-apply with a where join any different then an inner join with the ON (or where) join
SELECT
...
September 6, 2012 at 6:14 am
Nice question, I knew that one from experience :blush:
August 28, 2012 at 6:30 am
So simple it was scary.... Where is the catch, the typo, the misguided reference?
Thanks for the question.
August 8, 2012 at 8:58 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 118 total)