Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 187 total)
irena.bulatovic (3/4/2009)
Even if my server is cluster? This means that it does not need msdtc for failover?
It should not matter if you are on a cluster or not. ...
March 4, 2009 at 10:27 am
I believe your issue is that you have a lower case "s" instead of an upper case "S"
try doing
sqlcmd -S servername i- filename
instead of
sqlcmd -s servername i- filename
-S is...
March 4, 2009 at 9:36 am
Seems like you have something strange happening here.
I run the following code
create table floattest (id int identity(1,1), flval float)
insert into floattest
select flval from (Values (36.8413614879047), (16.094379124341), (6.23832462503951),
(27.6310211159286), (18.4206807439524),...
March 3, 2009 at 9:12 am
I definitely tend to agree with Ed and George on this one. I would personally prefer to stay as current with the technology as humanly possible when given the...
March 3, 2009 at 9:01 am
irena.bulatovic (3/2/2009)
thus this means that if I have transactions just on my server that I do not need msdtc?
That is correct. As long as you are not distributing transactions...
March 3, 2009 at 8:53 am
Any possibility of two different table structures that you could bring together through views?
Or perhaps you could create your own hierarchy structure that essentially works in the...
February 25, 2009 at 6:57 am
Moving a package from a SQL 2000 over to a SQL 2005 server will definitely not create a job for you to run that package. That is something you...
February 24, 2009 at 3:29 pm
I honestly have no idea what the thought process was behind this.
However, I suppose it is logical that since the Constraint exists on the table that the data would have...
February 20, 2009 at 10:14 am
A global (##) temp table can be dropped from any connection (not just the one that created it). A regular (#) temp table is tied to the connection...
February 20, 2009 at 9:54 am
I may be misunderstanding the question but if you are trying to get rid of a global temp table that should be as easy as find the table name
(select...
February 20, 2009 at 9:43 am
Your problem here is that the row that is causing it to fail is the row you are adding on the insert (it inserts, then checks so it will fail...
February 20, 2009 at 8:51 am
Based on the script you have here, it does not look like you have the tail of the transaction log backed up and that seems to be causing the problem....
February 19, 2009 at 4:13 pm
If you want to load data from a SQL 2000 into a SQL 2008 try using the SQL 2008 Import/Export tools instead. In just doing a quick test...
February 19, 2009 at 1:16 pm
Stamey (2/19/2009)
February 19, 2009 at 8:42 am
This runs incredibly fast on my local machine as well (not remotely fast desktop).
I am guessing with 3500 DB's you may very well be having some contention issues on tempdb...
February 19, 2009 at 8:03 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 187 total)