Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
I understand your overall point.
behave as if you were a lower version when running queries in this DB
I would argue that SQL Server is not doing this since the query...
December 13, 2012 at 1:08 pm
OK, thanks for the response. I guess there are two potential views on this setting:
1) Functionality that has been deprecated (or changed) in a newer version will be reverted...
December 13, 2012 at 9:52 am
Is there a list of these partially backwards compatible functionality changes documented anywhere?
December 12, 2012 at 9:23 am
Agreed that it is not optimal. However, that is a business decision and I have to deal with the current situation. There are technical reasons that an upgrade...
December 12, 2012 at 9:21 am
philcart (10/29/2007)
One thing I see a lot of is duplicate address fields...
October 29, 2007 at 9:53 pm
Grant Fritchey (10/29/2007)
October 29, 2007 at 9:45 pm
philcart (10/29/2007)
Presuming the field names have been changed to protect the innocent, how about posting something a little less generic and we might be able to steer you towards a...
October 29, 2007 at 9:41 am
I realize this is an older thread...but came across while looking up some info about Aliases and Linked Servers. One of the main reasons to use this approach was as...
September 20, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Michael,
Thanks for your reply. I have the SET XACT_ABORT statement in the stored procs. Does not help. The remote stored procedure returns a resultset after some complex processing. I can...
April 9, 2007 at 11:50 am
David,
Thanks for the reply. I have seen a number of articles on the issues with DTC Security changes with Windows XP/2003 and how to change the security settings to work with...
April 7, 2007 at 9:44 am
racosta,
It was not created with the NOT FOR REPLICATION property. I don't think that is even possible since the "NOT FOR REPLICATION" property only applies to IDENTITY Columns, Check Constraints & Foreign...
October 21, 2004 at 1:42 pm
I thought of that as well. I ran a trace on the Source server (Publisher) and the Destination server (Subscriber). The trace on the Subscriber shows the sp_MINS_XXX calls being...
September 13, 2004 at 11:20 am
Thanks for all the feedback.
I could not do a database detach because the database is setup for replication.
I ended up restoring an older version of the database and all is...
July 22, 2003 at 2:36 pm
We do not have a Backup Application running on this server that looks at the database files. Also, we have disabled the Anti-Virus program, but we are still getting...
July 21, 2003 at 12:39 pm
I have tried running sp_resetstatus(DBNAME) and then restarting SQL Server...did not help. I have also tried running sp_resetstatus(DBNAME) and then DBCC DBRECOVER(DBNAME) and I get the same error as...
July 21, 2003 at 12:38 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)