Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 258 total)
Hello adnani,
1: If the databases requires additional space there's not much you can do.
It seems that this is temporary, two things on that, if it's temporary you should be able...
August 16, 2010 at 6:22 am
Sure there's way to do it within SQL, but I wouldn't recommend them.
One of them is:
DECLARE @HDDDrivesList TABLE (
DriveLetter char(1)
, FreeSpaceLeft int NULL
)
INSERT @HDDDrivesList(DriveLetter,FreeSpaceLeft)
EXEC...
August 13, 2010 at 1:50 pm
if you're using enterprise edition or higher, why not take a look at partitioning horizontally your table?
This is a powerful functionality.
August 13, 2010 at 1:39 pm
Yes Celko, this is always a good point to have in mind. Thank you for this reminder!
August 11, 2010 at 6:15 am
Whoops!
Yes I was assuming this:
I think you're assuming that SQL Server would move all the pages in the clustered index if a split occurs.
Well I do have learn something new...
August 10, 2010 at 12:28 pm
Yes but from my understanding, time to perform a page split from a non clustered index <= time spent for a page split from a clustered index.
If that split occurs...
August 10, 2010 at 12:07 pm
True,
But I would like to avoid page split on a table with a possible 1,500 millions rows in it.
If it needs to insert at the beginning of the clustered index...
August 10, 2010 at 7:48 am
Thank you,
Therefore I presume by your answer that data inside the clustered index will be ordered like:
Ordering ->
1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1
Sorted by the first key, then by the...
August 10, 2010 at 7:30 am
I believe it could be possible (yet difficult) implementing the feature to restore a backup while having database snapshot.
August 3, 2010 at 8:54 am
Thank you!
It makes a lot of sense with the current state of the query.
May 11, 2010 at 9:21 am
Administrative operations need to be done automatically and autonomously.
Once deployed, there will be no way to go back and check.
April 27, 2010 at 6:39 am
:hehe: thank you for your support! I've already notice it was hard hence the question 😀
April 27, 2010 at 6:23 am
The best advice I could say is check the query plan for both and compare.
That will tell you what has happened.
In one scenario you might have a join task sooner...
March 25, 2010 at 11:37 am
I agree that the question is somewhat very large and may be interpreted in many ways.
The way I did see it at first was (translating "best administrative performance")
"What version will...
March 5, 2010 at 7:22 am
I've done a T-SQL sample to show what I mean:
Why NULLs are return on the DELETE statement from the Inserted table? I've not inserted anything!
Is it a "by design" feature...
March 4, 2010 at 12:05 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 258 total)