Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 258 total)
If I remember, at the bottom, 3 main tables were used. Each one having around 7000 entries in each (at most 32k rows). So we were not talking about millions...
January 29, 2008 at 1:17 pm
I've updated statistics on all tables and views and it didn't help.
I didn't saw the 3.5 billions row join in the plan. That's sure not helping the query!
What's sad (but...
January 16, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Oh
This is the query I used to rebuild all indexes in the database:
USE DatabaseName --Enter the name of the database you want to reindex
DECLARE @TableName varchar(255)
DECLARE TableCursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT table_name...
January 16, 2008 at 12:28 pm
From estimated execution plan, rebuilding indexes seem to help but the inner join query still have the issue while left join doesn't have.
Here's the zip file containing all estimated execution...
January 16, 2008 at 12:26 pm
Hi Grant Fritchey
I'll do as you say and post both plan
January 16, 2008 at 6:45 am
I've gave it a new try with indexes.
All underlying tables had clustered index on their primary key. As the Microsoft rule of thumb it is their preferred place. (I know...
January 16, 2008 at 6:43 am
Colins
Inner Join returns only rows that exist in both tables satisfying the join condition
Left Outer Join return all rows from the left join table whether or not there are any...
January 16, 2008 at 6:27 am
None of these
First I've reloaded a backup of the DB, then I've requested an estimated execution plan with the original query using inner join and check it.
Second, I've reloaded the...
January 16, 2008 at 6:11 am
Still unable to find out what's the cause of the issue.
Am I alone with that strange behaviour?
Could this be a CAL limitation for Win 2k3 R2 ?
December 10, 2007 at 7:26 am
Anyone ever had this kind of issue?
November 5, 2007 at 8:11 am
Hi
Just a reminder that SQL is not a server to echange mail. What I mean by that is in some rare circumstances it can make hang the entire server /...
October 30, 2007 at 11:15 am
Thanks for the reply.
The service pack issue, to my knowledge, didn't installed successfully because DTC wasn't configured at all so none of the instance had a transaction coordinator available which...
October 29, 2007 at 5:08 am
Ok thks to all of you.
I think I understand.
There's only one tempDB per SQL Server instance cluster or not.
That tempDB can be divided into filegroups which then can be moved...
October 2, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Inside the cluster, I'm having 2 active node and 1 passive node.
Each cluster node only contain 1 SQL Server instance.
If each SQL Server have it's own tempDB, how come can't...
October 2, 2007 at 12:53 pm
Just to make sure, a cluster node = virtual instance?
Or I will have as many tempDB as active node is that so?
And what about other system databases? (master, msdb and...
October 2, 2007 at 11:13 am
Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 258 total)