Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 67 total)
Hi,
sorted it with the help of a colleague. Makes use of SELECT statement in LEFT JOIN that returns the records that have been downloaded.
Has anyone got anything more concise?
Cheers
/*...
December 5, 2007 at 10:11 am
Oopps,
Replace
EXEC @rc = [FDRC_Labour].[dbo].[usp_InsertSurveyAnswers]
with your own DB name for testing.
June 6, 2006 at 9:58 am
Hi,
Not sure if the problem was due to the usual panic we sometimes encounter when this site is the last resort, but there were quite a few syntax errors...
June 6, 2006 at 9:45 am
All,
thanks very much for all the advice, and supporting me in the trauma of having to use the "c" thing
Serqiy, I did consider...
May 15, 2006 at 3:03 am
David,
personally I was thinking of using a temp table, and then iterating through each row to update the row count. Then at the end I could do a single SELECT...
May 12, 2006 at 7:28 am
P.S. Forgive the winks in the SQL code...too quick on the mouse clicks
May 12, 2006 at 2:47 am
Jeff,
Yes, I did not really give a full explanation. Maybe the best thing is if I attach the actual tables.
In terms of UI I will have:
a) Summary page listing all...
May 12, 2006 at 2:45 am
Hi Jeff,
Great article that truly highlights and explains the issues.
In relation to your observation about using Temp table to store interim results, to which you then apply set-based logic, I...
May 11, 2006 at 6:50 am
....he he he he. Now that is the ONLY thing I did not check. The schedule was in fact disabled. Thanks for that. Seems like a good question of the day...
February 10, 2006 at 10:13 am
Yup, tried the refresh too, but no luck. Still need to go back and check all the various accounts, but not sure how/why that would affect ONLY 1 of the...
February 10, 2006 at 8:42 am
That is what I immediately thought to check. But ithe job is both enabled and scheduled, and to double-check I just run it manually and the quirk still persists.
February 10, 2006 at 7:12 am
Phil,
I assume in your test you ran sp_attach_single_file_db given that you only had the MDF?
I'll try the test myself.
Mauro
October 13, 2005 at 10:44 am
Yes I agree, I suspect that the detach process might have actually caused the problem. Unfortunately the customer did not have a regular backup job running...and so I would suspect...
October 13, 2005 at 10:20 am
Hi,
Picking up on the previous conversation, I too am having the same problem. Unfortunately it's with a client database for which we have been sent the MDF, which we assume...
October 13, 2005 at 7:46 am
Thanks for the feedback, but I do still have some questions.
Vichka, not sure about what you propose. Are you saying that switching the OPTIONS Recovery Model from Simple to Full...
September 22, 2005 at 10:40 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 67 total)