Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 185 total)
Thank you both for your responses.
The reason I wrote the UDF with the parameter was to limit the amount of data that needed to be included when I did...
December 5, 2005 at 7:15 am
That's probably tomorrow's question.
I looked at the MSDN reference, and it had the following line:
The SQL-2003 synonym for char is character.
What is...
December 1, 2005 at 6:48 am
It could be that
pressure_date.datetime AS pressure_date
should be
pressure_data.datetime AS pressure_date
Mattie
November 22, 2005 at 7:08 am
Greg,
Thank you. When I see questions in a category like SQL Server 2005 - Security, I assume it's a change from 2000.
Mattie
November 17, 2005 at 10:17 am
How does this differ from what would happen in SQL Server 2000?
Mattie
November 17, 2005 at 9:14 am
Thank you both so much. I couldn't get it out of my head that I should be using an exotic join condition or something other than 'equals'.
Mike, I appreciate...
November 1, 2005 at 2:34 pm
I found this logic somewhere on this site, and I use it all the time to build email lists. It doesn't seem to have a problem with the leading or...
September 22, 2005 at 7:01 am
I'm hoping (actually, I'm pretty sure) that 'when charindex('TWP', City) > 0' is SQLese for 'when the starting location of the text string 'TWP', in column City, is not zero'. ...
August 31, 2005 at 12:28 pm
Getting back to cspangler's original question, I suspect you don't want to replace the entire contents of City, just the abbreviations used. If that's the case, I think you...
August 30, 2005 at 10:07 am
I really enjoyed the interview, but I didn't quite follow this:
It included 15 months in year 3
Is that a metric year? Or does it explain Microsoft's release schedule?
July 28, 2005 at 10:30 am
That's it: public has select access on all tables in the Enroll database, but no execute access. I'm guessing that's so their stored procedures can have access across databases.
When I...
July 27, 2005 at 12:37 pm
Brian,
Thanks so much. I'm guessing I'll have to stick with the copy method, because the powers that be will most likely tell me your solution violates stricture #2:
No changes...
July 27, 2005 at 11:34 am
No, I haven't added in the rollback yet. Incredibly enough, it's more important to me to track what's happening when it fails than to have it not fail. So far,...
June 8, 2005 at 11:20 am
Remi,
Well, as always happens when I'm trying to isolate why something fails intermittently, everything they tried today worked. So I'll keep my log table going until the process fails, and...
June 8, 2005 at 11:10 am
Released from the hospital would be this icon I suppose.
I don't explicitly rollback the transaction after the first sp_executesql because I thought that exiting...
June 7, 2005 at 12:32 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 185 total)