Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
I think I need to do some more investigation to see what locks are being held.
Thanks everyone for your help. I may be back!
September 2, 2011 at 9:09 am
Duplicate or missing rows is not a concern in this instance but blocking other processes is.
Many thanks
September 2, 2011 at 9:00 am
The sp only does a select, no updates, inserts, deletes or schema modifications. Would you still expect a lock?
Thanks
September 2, 2011 at 3:41 am
Don't know if you have this sorted already but...
On each article there are properties. One is Action if name is in use. The default is to drop the object and...
August 5, 2011 at 3:39 am
Excellent thanks. I think that option would work 🙂
June 19, 2011 at 6:36 am
If I replicate the view, I will also need to replicate the base tables wont I?
I don't really want a view over the current tables, I would like a flattened...
June 17, 2011 at 5:02 am
If this is run on a production server, would other queries interfer with the results. I assume because you are doing a snapshot, you do not want anything else to...
September 17, 2009 at 2:53 am
I don't show them anything otherwise they will start to ask stupid questions, if they insist
Jan - slow
Feb - better
Mar - even better
Apr - good
May - very good
Jun - good
Jul...
September 16, 2009 at 9:25 am
SQL Server doesn't know the best plan to use because the values are dynamic and therefore can't take into account value distribution etc
September 16, 2009 at 8:39 am
Silverfox (9/16/2009)
k.przewozniak (9/16/2009)
I have mirroring implemented on 3 servers (1- mirror, 2 - principal, 3 - witness)
The problem is that there is not only one database to be mirrored but...
September 16, 2009 at 4:50 am
There was a message to say that ID's would change for some reason. I think it is intentional
September 16, 2009 at 4:49 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)