Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 330 total)
Steve
Sorry - would have quoted but the forum was insistent on quoting another post when I clicked quote 😀
I would put money on the fact that when you used SET...
September 15, 2009 at 7:59 am
Heh
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sample+tally+table+t-sql
and
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=create+scalar+function+t-sql
Sorry - i'm more of a 'give a man a fishing rod' kind of guy 😀
September 15, 2009 at 3:39 am
My guess (place your bets now people) is that in your UDF you are calling DateTime.Parse(). If that's the case, use DateTime.ParseExact(). Pass in null for the IFormatProvider.
I've got to...
September 15, 2009 at 3:28 am
sbowell (9/15/2009)
I need to update the SQL to use the 2005 system views but never-the-less you get the idea.
Can I just say - if you're on 2008 (i know this...
September 15, 2009 at 3:18 am
singhster (9/15/2009)
Thanks for the other responses, I've gone down the sp_rename route, and it seems to be working well for me.
Glad to be of service.
Can I offer you one bit...
September 15, 2009 at 3:14 am
Nice one Lynn 🙂
I've found that for deleting a sub-section of data from a much larger table (for example - can we delete history from transactions table that is over...
September 15, 2009 at 1:54 am
Paul White (9/14/2009)
September 14, 2009 at 4:58 pm
adjas (9/14/2009)
Any ideas?
Reading the thread? 😀
September 14, 2009 at 2:41 pm
sp_rename is your friend for this one...
September 14, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Write a scalar UDF that returns you a MAC address based on an int, then use a commonly documented tally table method to generate the MAC addresses based on your...
September 14, 2009 at 2:38 pm
I have a feeling you might have misunderstood triggers on views... A trigger on a view will fire when rows on the view are updated/inserted/deleted from - not when one...
September 14, 2009 at 1:33 pm
kiran.hegde (9/7/2009)
September 14, 2009 at 1:01 pm
george.hames (9/14/2009)
Any of these behaviors would be acceptable if documented. Returning bad data without raising an exception is not acceptable, ever.
Nope, it's not. But that's how it is...
As for...
September 14, 2009 at 12:55 pm
ben.mcintyre (9/14/2009)
D'oh, since most of my clients are still on 2000 ...
Doh. In 2000 sys.sql_dependencies is sysdepends - and it exhibits the same broken behaviour. But then on 2000 you're...
September 14, 2009 at 7:48 am
Bob Hovious (9/14/2009)
It means Ni?Does it always?
No, not when the knights who say ni are no longer the knights who say ni, but the knights who say 'ekki-ekki-ekki-pitang-zoom-boing'. 🙂
September 14, 2009 at 7:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 330 total)