Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Thanks for the response. I had a really tough time summarizing my issue and now that I read over it, I can see I wasn't really clear about my specific...
June 23, 2011 at 10:23 am
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (3/11/2011)
Backup/Restore and Detach/Attach methods are not supposed to change collation on target system e.g. collation remains the same as the...
March 11, 2011 at 11:29 am
This is the answer I was anticipating. I posted this same question on about 5 different sites and either no one replied or no one knew. And I really tried...
March 7, 2011 at 8:20 am
I agree. You should never assume that any optimization has actually optimized anything until you test it. Testing L2S is a pain in the *** because you basically need to...
December 2, 2010 at 9:44 am
Well the find query that I am currently optimizing is paged so it returns at most 20 rows on a 2.5million row table. So I guess by using paging I...
December 2, 2010 at 9:35 am
Thanks so much for the link. That was a great introduction to indexes, something I sorely needed!
I do have a couple questions however. The 3rd part on non-clustered indexes and...
December 2, 2010 at 9:14 am
The @Value is coming from an ASP.NET business object. So should I be doing a search and replace for the _ character and using the ESCAPE thing? Seems like there...
May 7, 2009 at 3:10 pm
OIC the parameter is still a parameter in the query. I was thinking for some reason the @p_Value would be replaced inline with the value but it just works as...
May 7, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Okay still no luck.
My query now looks something like this:
DECLARE @sql nvarchar(MAX),
@OP nvarchar(9),
@Name nvarchar(128),
...
May 7, 2009 at 11:02 am
Thanks for the quick replies!
So I thought the point of the parametrization was to avoid using string concatenation?
But it only works in certain situations? That's odd.
I suppose I could...
May 7, 2009 at 10:45 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)