Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 90 total)
Management here has no idea what I do. They just know that after 3 other AS400 administrators, there have always been complaints about performance, and bugs, and that the vast...
October 9, 2006 at 9:33 am
I'd have to agree with some of the above few posts. I was a bit caught up in what I'm used to, and had forgotten about things such as cracking...
October 9, 2006 at 7:09 am
no, you got it right... I hit the wrong quote button.... doing too many things at once at work :/
October 5, 2006 at 11:29 am
I guess I've let my experiences get the better of me. Yes, I can think of plenty of applications where a long run time is acceptable. Just not the same...
October 5, 2006 at 11:18 am
They never really start out as 5 hour programs... they tend to start out as 20 min programs... then a year later they're 40 min... and the next year they're...
October 5, 2006 at 11:08 am
I'd have to agree. I'm VERY picky about execution speed. Of course, 11 min is a massive improvement over 5 hours... but... Unless we're talking something massive here, I think...
October 5, 2006 at 10:09 am
Laugh, actually, I never had to deal with a system configured for a green background with black letters... although, I have seen it done. The up side, now I'm the AS400...
September 20, 2006 at 6:33 am
So is windowism a religion, or only the *nix fundies? <cower> sorry, I couldn't resist...
Personally I can't decide on the monoculture. on one hand, it's nice that everything plays nice......
September 19, 2006 at 10:31 am
and I was joking about the unfashionable. more likely a numeric designation, or quadrant designation would be better. it just fit well
unluckily I...
August 30, 2006 at 11:15 am
you go with mostlyharmless, but not unfashionable? you should be ashamed of yourself...
is the term for our cluster medium? I wasn't sure how galaxy clusters were defined, so I left...
August 30, 2006 at 10:51 am
that works... Stanley-Brown Astronomy nomenclature it is... (I'm becoming very tempted to throw up a website for this... who wants to start a project to classify 'everything' <kof>
August 30, 2006 at 10:23 am
oh... I hate it when that happens... the browser ate my post...
satellites don't classify as smallsolarobjects, so, I think we actually need.
moon.naturallyoccuring.satellite.earth.mostlyharmless.planet.solarsystem.unfashionable.arm.milkyway.spiral.galaxy.cluster.universe.multiverst.fnord.42
or to get a bit back towards topic... I...
August 30, 2006 at 10:19 am
oops... we both missed an obvious link...
earth.mostlyharmless.planet.solarsystem.milkyway.galaxy.cluster.universe.multiverst.fnord
August 30, 2006 at 10:00 am
ok... that's it... string theory time...
Dimension doesn't fit ... I'm thinking earth.mostlyharmless.planet.solarsystem.universe.multiverse.fnord...
The problem being that universe encompases either 4 or 9? (I forget what string theory indicates) either way, multiverse...
August 30, 2006 at 9:54 am
"planet earth - class 1 - mostly harmless"
come on... all that classing, and not a single mostly harmless class M planet <kof>
August 30, 2006 at 9:11 am
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 90 total)