Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Paul,
Thanks for your reply again. Because of some load issues I was not been able to try the query out as yet but it makes sense logically and it should...
August 8, 2005 at 10:33 am
Thanks for your replies. Paul you are absolutely right that the tricky part is rule#3. I am having difficulty with this rule. I'll try your query and will let you...
August 5, 2005 at 9:28 am
Thanks for your reply Remi. The expected result in the above example should be:
Case.........Client........Age.........Inc Code
------------------------------------------------
125...........598...........68..........Y
125...........599...........33..........A
127..........600............22..........A
127..........600............22..........X
Case#125 is counted because both the clients are valid clients. The first...
August 4, 2005 at 10:40 am
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)