Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 101 total)
Jim,
Thank you! I did consider sharing my choices at some length when writing the article, however, I decided not to in the end, because there are so many variables involved,...
April 21, 2005 at 7:12 am
Thanks for the compliment TSG. Not sure how they can do this, as the dynamic SQL that SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Manager kicks off to get the database details is...
April 20, 2005 at 8:52 am
Thanks for the comments guys, useful feedback like this is always much appreciated.
Unfortunately, yes, scripting of the table & stored proc security permissions does seem to be a limitation of...
April 14, 2005 at 8:33 am
Excellent article Brian, and one which applied equally to sysadmins and security managers. Highlights too the failings of auditors, who all too often seem to only be after ticks in...
March 21, 2005 at 2:03 am
Declan, Michael,
I can't comment on your experiences of the companies involved as I've not personally had dealings with them or their products.
However, from a "usefulness to other DBAs and developers"...
March 16, 2005 at 2:14 am
Nice one Steve, I enjoyed that. Short, sweet, to the point and relevant. Also makes a change to the totally technical stuff that SSC specialies in (that's not a criticism...
March 15, 2005 at 1:42 am
Very nice Alzdba, wasn't aware of SCPTXFR
Try this one too if you fancy doing some SQLDMO coding:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/01/05/sqldmo/default.aspx
March 2, 2005 at 5:12 am
Pleasure, if I discover a better way, I'll post back here and let you know.
March 2, 2005 at 4:55 am
Aspurr,
Good point Vidas, but you might want to script the structure only, for source control reasons or to satisfy audit requirements. If you've got a 50Gb database it might...
March 2, 2005 at 4:48 am
Many thanks Frank, Antares. Must admit I've seen a few copies of the Pinnacle publication some years back, and I thought that SQL Server Magazine was the better buy, so...
March 1, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Greg,
I believe the Developer Edition will have all of the features of the Enterprise Edition, but with the development only licensing restrictions, as per SQL Server 2000.
February 28, 2005 at 10:42 am
Thanks Kishore, I didn't know you could do it through EM, I'd always used QA previously. As an aside, it's not possible to even copy an .mdf/.ldf of an attached...
February 23, 2005 at 11:54 am
Woah, stop right there.
Yes it can be attached without a log file. Kishore is correct in stating that sp_attach_single_file_db can be used to attach an .mdf file without a matching...
February 23, 2005 at 3:44 am
David,
My own experience says that if your database files are on the same data and log volumes as each other, it's probably a good idea to stagger the maintenance plans...
February 15, 2005 at 4:59 am
Just to add to what Frank's already stated:
Say if i build my mdf database in SQL server developer edition, load data, test data, run queries. Then send the mdf and...
February 10, 2005 at 7:04 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 101 total)