Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 310 total)
samsql (4/7/2009)
how do i do this ......'Lock Pages in Memory' permission to the SQL Server service.
Rather, provide the permission to the SQL Server Service, Service Account i.e. the Windows Account...
April 7, 2009 at 5:19 am
As you are using a 32bit version of SQL Server on a 64 bit operating system, you need to enable AWE in order to use memory above 4GB.
You also need...
April 7, 2009 at 3:18 am
Hi,
You should be able to find what you are looking for here:
April 7, 2009 at 1:48 am
Krishna Potlakayala (4/6/2009)
When it is in Stand by status, you would be able to access the secondary databaseWhat is your purpose of your logshipping?
In addition to what Krishna said,...
April 6, 2009 at 7:15 am
Hi,
Take a look at the Microsoft white paper SQL Server 2005 Failover Clustering
I would also suggest that you try and implement a clustered configuration. You can do this on a...
April 6, 2009 at 7:12 am
April 5, 2009 at 5:04 am
Hi,
So you are currently running.
1. Windows Server 64 bit?
2. SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition(32 bit)?
What Edition of Windows Server are you running Enterprise/Standard?
Cheers,
April 4, 2009 at 3:39 am
EdVassie (4/3/2009)
Ed what fix are you refering to?
Apologies, I got my SQL versions mixed up. However, there are fixes for AWE issues post SP2, but nothing that is pervasive.
No...
April 3, 2009 at 9:41 am
SA (4/3/2009)
It's clearly not using AWE. The only thing that's not setup correctly is the fact that the run_value output from sp_configure 'AWE Enabled' is 0 while the config_value is...
April 3, 2009 at 8:26 am
EdVassie (4/3/2009)
Also make...
April 3, 2009 at 8:21 am
SA (4/3/2009)
April 3, 2009 at 7:29 am
Afternoon,
I believe some of the more recent posts, although naturally only trying to assist, are instead confusing the issue somewhat.
To my understanding the original problem was AWE had not been...
April 3, 2009 at 7:10 am
Hi,
Can you please re-explain exactly what your issue is?
Cheers,
April 3, 2009 at 3:31 am
The /3GB switch is not the answer to your problems. It would however permit SQL Server to have access to an additional 1GB of memory should you wish.
By enabling the...
April 2, 2009 at 7:23 am
Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 310 total)