Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
I think it's important that languages are allowed to evolve safely, otherwise the mistakes of our ancestors will forever burden us. Look no further than \r\n or should I say \n,...
August 5, 2018 at 11:49 pm
Notepad++ and WinMerge.
And I see that Notepad++ was mentioned 8 years ago, so that's gotta give it good toaster creds.
July 26, 2018 at 10:47 pm
Very clearly written. Although I share some of the concerns of other commentators about the performance and design of your chosen solution, I thought that overall your description of pros...
November 6, 2017 at 1:01 pm
L' Eomot Inversé (11/3/2013)
November 3, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I do appreciate the potential performance benefits of filtering the target early. However if clarity is of a higher priority, another approach is to give up using just one...
October 29, 2013 at 4:08 pm
Venkataraman R (10/28/2013)
The dangerous side of MERGE talks about how MERGE statement with wrong usage can wipe out data: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/MERGE/97867/#.Um5Zwk6LY0Q.twitter
I saw that article (you'll probably notice a rather...
October 29, 2013 at 3:18 pm
hunchback (10/25/2013)
October 28, 2013 at 1:47 pm
Yes, I agree that for most SELECT statements the ON clause is seen as a filtering condition, particularly for inner joins when the ON condition is equivalent to the WHERE...
October 24, 2013 at 8:24 pm
Thanks for the script, but I don't think your description is quite right:
Notice that in the first script we still update the tuple (1, 'A') even though there is no...
October 24, 2013 at 2:49 pm
Comment deleted, and reposted as a new topic: Merge documentation misleading?
September 9, 2013 at 4:30 pm
odepriester (9/6/2013)
btw, wouldn't it be better writing your example query more like :
SELECT * FROM t
WHERE (a<>0) and (b= 2 * a)
?
It will avoid the "CASE" term
Sometimes a rewrite...
September 8, 2013 at 4:08 pm
Hi
A curiosity : In my case this strange behaviour helps to find a potential data issue but speaking in general term shouldn't it be considered an error of...
September 1, 2013 at 3:24 pm
A possible reason for this error is that the division expressions are being evaluated for some rows before those rows are excluded by the WHERE clause. The same problem...
August 29, 2013 at 3:12 pm
Excellent guide. Thank you.
Normally I find such detailed step-by-step instructions boring, but I think in this case it is ideal. Not knowing anything about Visual Studio (like many...
August 13, 2013 at 3:37 pm
Glad it helped
July 30, 2013 at 2:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)