Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
I'm guessing that you are using DBREINDEX to reorg your table. I've had similar problems when trying to reorg a 15GB clustered table. The datafile had to be sized to...
May 18, 2004 at 1:54 am
Unfortunately shrinking after the restore requires me to have the available space on the server in the first place in order to do the restore. We are currently restricted on...
May 6, 2004 at 1:38 am
We had a similar problem where we had different values in Min and Max Memory settings (eg Dynamically managed) and Set Working Set Size was set. I concluded that these...
May 6, 2004 at 1:06 am
Thank you for your replies. Our main concern was related to the particular application that was running on SQL Server. We were not 100% confident that changing the timezone could...
April 21, 2004 at 8:31 pm
I also tried another test on a test server. W2K Enterprise, 4gb ram. Enabled AWE and saw over 3GB of memory being used. I also tried using the Min and...
April 1, 2004 at 10:43 pm
This still doesn't explain why my DR Server that has AWE enabled can get close to 3GB of memory being used. When I run this SQL on the DR server...
March 30, 2004 at 2:35 am
Hmmm. Interesting. After reading both articles I guess I have to accept that I can't use AWE or /3GB.
According to the sql-server-performance article I shouldn't use AWE:
"If you...
March 29, 2004 at 8:22 pm
There is a good possibility that the /3GB switch has been used at some stage. Last year we had a Microsoft consultant looking at some performance issues that we had....
March 29, 2004 at 6:52 pm
Thank you for your replies however I'm still unclear as to what is required.
My findings (and Mark's comments) would suggest that you can have AWE enabled without the /3GB...
March 29, 2004 at 5:19 pm
I will certainly investigate if the database does in fact require a SHRINKDATABASE. Being new to SQL Server I was assuming that whoever set this process up knew what they...
December 17, 2003 at 1:14 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)