Really?...

Oh man, how can they break a working feature in 2008/2012 into 2014?

Sigh, just found this issue on my 2014 Standard/Enterprise also

Good news - it's now fixed in CU4 (build...

Rated...

Thanks for this timely introductory article, as I am doing research on AlwaysOn this week 🙂

Some requirements though

AG Group is only available on Enterprise edition @@ = costly. I believe...

Standard:

At least max. limit is raised from 64GB to 128GB now

Enterprise:

True that to all new EE features, although I doubt we'll benefit from any 😛

hence we should consolidate...

Any updates to this now that SQL 2014 is released?

We aren't upgrading widely, but new SCOM 2012 requires SQL 2012, and MS has said it should also support SQL 2014...

Nicholas Cain (12/15/2008)

---

You could salvage this by creating the group and adding the items and dependencies back manually, make sure that you have all the information that you built the...

I tried to do this (adding SQLName\Instance2 to existing SQLName\Instance1) today (SQL 2008 SP3 cluster) and confirmed it would NOT work @@

I was hoping it would work so I can...

Direct link to download page, without registration (the link in article leads to registration before showing you this link @@)

http://us.demo.qlikview.com/download/[/url]

64-bit is 255MB

Link to PDF worked for me this morning (Nov 6th)

http://assets.red-gate.com/community/books/assets/sql-server-hardware-ebook.pdf

Thank you for the book, I'll give it a read

It's useful for any DBA who wasn't initially involved in...

that sucks.. I hope it's not backward-compatible 🙂

I don't want an expiry date on my Certificate

Also, Microsoft will increase the Certification price also

e.g. in Canada, it'll be $125 -> $150...

Just to add, this is what shows in SQL 2005

DBCC traceon (3604) WITH no_infomsgs

dbcc page (9,1,6340633) with ...

Most of the time I just do SELECT directly

but temp...

See if this link helps (thanks Google)

http://www.mssqltips.com/tip.asp?tip=960

I have done it in 2005 but not for 2000

That is interesting, one shouldn't be able to login unless he/she belongs to a group

You could try removing permissions group by group and see (e.g. make those groups Public roles...