Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 226 total)
yep, that's in the first part of my post.
February 13, 2009 at 10:10 am
so does that include all of the hotfixes listed here?
February 12, 2009 at 10:01 am
That helps as in I included Buffer as a name earlier, but I'm attaching an image of what I get now.
February 9, 2009 at 10:05 am
It makes a little sense.
I made the change to Output like you said and it didn't work. I then changed it to DiskUsageVariablesBuffer like your example and it doesn't work...
February 9, 2009 at 8:11 am
It seems that all of it is correct but I still get the error.
I'm including a pdf attachment that has some of my screens.
February 6, 2009 at 7:27 am
Disclaimer:I am no programmer. This is a weak area for me so terminoligy may be weak.
is it declared as a source?
I have no clue.
also....
February 5, 2009 at 8:48 am
On the Script Component within the last Loop I'm getting:
Name 'OutputBuffer' is not declared.
I went through the pdf and I noticed some parts are missing but I can't figure this...
February 5, 2009 at 8:26 am
I couldn't find the link or I would have included it. Thanks Michael.
February 3, 2009 at 7:07 am
See if this will help you at all. I've had good luck with it.
-- Shrink_DB_File.sql
/*
This script is used to shrink a database file in
increments until it reaches a target free...
February 2, 2009 at 10:19 pm
Do you have the ability to disable log shipping to make the change?
February 2, 2009 at 10:09 pm
At exactly what level are these user objects missing?
Are you in remotely?
Have you tried from both SSMS and EM on the SQL Server locally?
February 2, 2009 at 9:51 pm
I think you have the right idea. I wouldn't think that the Min Memory would be as important as the max when you choose your value. Someone else could probably...
February 2, 2009 at 9:23 pm
As to your code, it seems that you'd have to account for the possibility of an .ndf from the filelistonly as I don't believe you are doing that. It's late...
February 2, 2009 at 9:15 pm
That's what we are currently doing and we've had issues.
Looks like we are going to use it to do a file backup on the .Bak from now on.
February 2, 2009 at 1:10 pm
Sorry, I believe it's this one that they are using:
CA ARCserve® Backup
February 2, 2009 at 10:53 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 226 total)