Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 901 total)
This might be more efficient for creating the columns also you would need to put the ColNameXX into the square brackets like [ColName1] etc.
This will generate upto 256 columns in...
June 14, 2013 at 3:56 am
Technically there is a way to do this, but it would mean using a Script task which creats the connection, executes the relevant stored proc, and manipulates the data into...
June 14, 2013 at 3:33 am
If its only called once a day then its not too bad, so probably an Amber for refactoring, it it was being run more regulararly then you may want to...
June 12, 2013 at 7:59 am
I have found that when naming default constraints they are best defined as something line DF_<schema>_<table>_<column>
This avoids name collisons in the same database.
June 12, 2013 at 7:26 am
Abu Dina (6/12/2013)
with SCC_CTE(vend_i, dept, tot_wgt)as (select 1, 1, 75 union all
select 2, 2, 40 union all
select 3, 4, 50 union all
select 3, 5, 80)
select vend_i, dept from
(select ROW_NUMBER()...
June 12, 2013 at 2:52 am
Another couple of things I noticed that you might want to change, the use of @@Identity which isnt thread safe, so you might want to consider switching it to use...
June 12, 2013 at 2:46 am
I think there are specific counters in Performance monitor for SSRS, have a look in Performance Monitor for SSRS related counters.
Although reporting Services should be fairly lean in terms of...
June 12, 2013 at 2:33 am
Hi,
Can you provide the query you already have and we can then offer guidance on where things may be wrong.
June 12, 2013 at 2:10 am
I've been playing around with an 'addin' for VS2008 database projects to do simple coding standards checks eg non Alpha characters in object names, the use of tbl_, t_ prefixes,...
June 12, 2013 at 2:00 am
It could be parameter sniffing but SQL server can do some peculiar things when you have number of nested views, such that it doesnt use the optimal plan at the...
June 11, 2013 at 9:03 am
The reason the plan for the Archive DB doesnt change is because its read only, where as the 'live' db will have data being added/removed during the day so it...
June 11, 2013 at 7:12 am
No problem, I empathise with how you must feel.
I was playing around with the resource guvenour about a year ago, hes my post on what I'd done with a...
June 11, 2013 at 3:32 am
As far as im aware the Plans get removed from the Cache when
1) Stats are updated, thus invalidating existing plans.
2) the table is altered
3) Indexes are rebuilt/added/deleted
4) SQL Instance...
June 11, 2013 at 3:25 am
If its for an emergancy test environment you might be able to get away with a Developer edition of SQL server.
Or if anyone has been on a MS...
June 11, 2013 at 3:14 am
THeres also a very good White paper on the resource governor which can be found here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee151608(v=sql.100).aspx
If you've read BoL then I would suggest reading this next as it goes...
June 11, 2013 at 2:09 am
Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 901 total)