Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 222 total)
CONNECT SQL is a right given to the user through the public role. (Database level - Security | Roles | Database Roles | public
The CONNECT permission can be removed...
April 26, 2016 at 10:09 am
Can anyone confirm that this is a comprehensive list of the permissions?
http://www.databasesql.info/article/124980796/
Integration Services
Default instance or a named instance: SQLServerDTSUser $ ComputerName
The service capacity...
February 6, 2016 at 4:54 am
This is an old discussion. It may still be relevant. Has anyone ever attempted to map the permissions required to create the ACL's and so on for these...
February 6, 2016 at 4:40 am
Seems like the problem arises when a new service account is given permissions / added on the server. The DTS is an admin function and occasionally there are reasons...
January 6, 2016 at 6:40 am
This post caught my interest because it is recommended that a compressed index be dealt with offline:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd894051(v=sql.100).aspx
So to address the issue as to why one may want to...
June 3, 2015 at 7:23 am
"the type initializer for '' threw an exception" is the error that is created when the redgatemonitor database is created on the server during the sql monitor setup process.
April 9, 2015 at 5:45 am
While not likely the msdb could have been restored from a backup that did not have the same logical name, you may wish to check on what logical name is...
February 25, 2015 at 6:02 pm
Tom,
Mostly, by way of English language flow. It is simple to say "Show me the stuff that isn't there or show me what you've got IN there." No...
December 28, 2014 at 2:25 pm
I didn't think I was actually blaming Microsoft. I may not be very clear when I state the deal as it appears to me. What I was trying...
December 27, 2014 at 12:43 pm
I'll be the first to admit I took a sharp right turn here.
Still, very valid point ... "NOT IN" and "IN" opens itself up to SQL abuse. ...
December 26, 2014 at 8:04 am
Yep, you're right. So if you are using an "IN" or a "NOT IN" statement, not only is it faster to join than use "IN" or "NOT IN", make...
December 26, 2014 at 6:35 am
Maybe. I thought the point was that there was a third variable, in this case a null which compares as equal to all the values of the name so...
December 25, 2014 at 7:24 pm
I'm coming in late on this question. It's been my experience the "IN" operator in SQL is EXTREMELY inefficient. The why it is inefficient - the "why"...
December 25, 2014 at 7:50 am
Did you ever resolve this? I have a similar situation. I'm on a VM where the firewall is turned on so I put in an exception for the...
December 10, 2014 at 12:27 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 222 total)