Viewing 9 posts - 121 through 129 (of 129 total)
You are right, RAID 5 is faster for READ, but slower for WRITE than RAID 1. The main reason for RAID 5's "slowness" in writing is because of the transactional...
February 10, 2004 at 12:56 pm
I believe that may be a typo, as I also found this in BOL (emphasis added by me):
Data striping (RAID 0) is the RAID configuration with the highest performance, but...
February 10, 2004 at 12:49 pm
Actually, RAID 5 is not the correct answer. RAID 1 is. The problem with RAID 5 for transaction logs is that, except in the event of a recovery or rollback,...
February 10, 2004 at 11:29 am
Quesion was submitted by the fans of Joseph Heller
-- Major Major Major
February 5, 2004 at 7:08 am
Uh, from BOL:
When sending messages from Transact-SQL procedures, triggers, batches, and so on, use the RAISERROR statement instead of xp_logevent. xp_logevent does not call a client's message handler or set...
February 5, 2004 at 7:06 am
Statistics don't lie, but liars use statistics --Dr. Harrington
February 5, 2004 at 6:42 am
I used to have that same opinion actually but then I had a conversation with someone who has been in software development for several years. My feelings haven't changed, mind...
February 3, 2004 at 11:17 am
Well written article and several good points.
One question: Can you get my IT Director to read it?
Seriously, true DR/BC shouldn't be one...
January 28, 2004 at 6:45 am
You are correct, it is part of the c2 auditing. I had to look it up online and in BOL myself because I had never heard of it. Look up...
December 8, 2003 at 6:53 am
Viewing 9 posts - 121 through 129 (of 129 total)