Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 129 total)
Your theory is sound but DCOM doesn't work that way, unfortunately. What you are referring to is a stateful firewall. What this means is that if server A behind firewall...
March 31, 2004 at 12:15 pm
Yes, I've seen that article too, and you are right assuming the "server" can freely talk to the "client" on any port. However, the article also states:
You should be...
March 31, 2004 at 10:26 am
Ditto. We ran into this where I currently work with a web-based database app. Royal pain in the neck until we figured it out.
March 31, 2004 at 6:35 am
Good points.
My manual routine actually ships every 4 hours and will fail if someone is in the database and will try to restore the file that it copied to the...
March 25, 2004 at 6:01 am
FOUL! Bad question. 5 yard penalty. Repeat QOD!
Seriously, this isn't a good question because if fails to explain HOW the log shipping is configured. I'm doing log shipping by hand...
March 25, 2004 at 5:45 am
Carl,
I have to wonder if the error has something to do with the SQL Server log and not the Windows log...
If I could suggest you take a look...
March 17, 2004 at 5:16 am
I must take exception with the explanation, actually:
All the T-SQL methods above will work but you cannot tell the version of SQL Server...
March 1, 2004 at 10:23 am
Cheers for having the courage to at least submit one and subject yourself to the scrutiny of geeks.
February 25, 2004 at 7:59 am
Actually, that wouldn't be correct either, would it? I mean, the correct answer should be:
"The entire transaction log will be applied but the database will be left in a non-recovered...
February 25, 2004 at 7:17 am
I guess it would be a matter of degree and the type of database we are talking about.
If this were an OLTP database I would probably agree with you 100%....
February 24, 2004 at 7:09 am
Actually, one of the main benefits of the FULL recovery model in SQL 2000 is the ability to restore a transaction log to a point-in-time using the WITH STOPAT option.
February 24, 2004 at 6:54 am
What we saw was a large number of "Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch" errors (in the SQL Log) followed by "The logfile is full" messages even though...
February 12, 2004 at 5:57 am
My last word on this: http://h71019.www7.hp.com/aa_downloads/6/100/225/1/50250.pdf
HP's Best Practices document on how to set up SQL server. They recommend RAID 1 (or 0+1) for the transaction logs. Search for the...
February 10, 2004 at 3:01 pm
1. Google returns no rows for a "TSC test server".
Probably not (because I meant TPC ), but read the doc you linked to. They...
February 10, 2004 at 2:39 pm
A few comments:
1. A RAID 1 can survive a single drive failure. A RAID 5 cannot survive a multiple drive failure. A RAID 10 can survive a multiple drive failure,...
February 10, 2004 at 2:18 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 129 total)