Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 311 total)
What about the data in table tblStocks ?
(First, I strongly suggest you lose the habit of prefixing table names with "tbl" -- It does nothing to help understand the code).
Left...
December 4, 2008 at 8:49 am
Learning about stored procs.
I am greatly simplifying things here: you could consider stored procedure as containers where can you store SQL code in the database to let the database server...
December 4, 2008 at 8:28 am
So, the actual need was security and acces privileges.
OK, I was not aware as to where Adventure Works was headed in SS2K8 ...
Learning something every day...
I am now marrying an...
November 27, 2008 at 8:55 am
First off, WHY do you "need" (??) to create tables and set table ownership ?
Could you not just use a common table with an extra field like "OwnerID"to keep the...
November 27, 2008 at 8:16 am
No,
I did not try what you suggested.
What I did just try was to begin a transaction in a query analyzer window then do a select on a table.
I then started...
November 21, 2008 at 11:31 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (11/19/2008)
Even with a transaction if you run your code like this :
begin tran
if not...
November 21, 2008 at 11:13 am
@Gail
My mistake. I did not immediately realize that @data was a parameter.
Too stuck up in my personal convention of labelling parameters with prefix @ps_ (if a strting) to...
November 19, 2008 at 7:10 am
Gail,
I have always found your writings very interesting.
Regarding your solution, it is not immediately clear how your suggestion works in terms of being less susceptible to attack. Would you...
November 17, 2008 at 6:59 am
RML51:
Unless you will not allow the users to change their password to one of their own liking -- for instance banks DO allow users to change their PIN number and...
November 14, 2008 at 9:14 am
woops...
I did not try to run and test the code.
Thanks for doing this. Very useful.
November 13, 2008 at 8:44 am
Nice !
There also might be confusion between letter "G" and number 6...
November 13, 2008 at 8:11 am
what is your purpose exactly ?
if distinct sources are updating the same table at approximately the same time, SQL Server will process them one after the other.
You could have problems...
November 7, 2008 at 2:37 pm
After sleeping over it, I am now considering creating a database that will only hold the table. That database can have a name known in advance and that will not...
November 6, 2008 at 10:07 am
Of course.
I would expect any "Senior DBA" to make a backup FIRST.
November 6, 2008 at 9:58 am
Now, this is a workaround I can live with. Good idea.
But I am still miffed at not having my points. (grin).
November 6, 2008 at 9:10 am
Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 311 total)