Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
I wrote this article a couple of years ago (back in 2003) - so I was wondering why I was getting emails on this all of the sudden!
April 21, 2006 at 3:51 pm
Chris - this is an excellent article. Great work!
November 9, 2005 at 9:25 am
A few thoughts...
First off - I don't think the author intentionally wanted to set off this wave of discussion. He's probably a bright guy who wrote this completely off-the-cuff, and...
October 17, 2005 at 1:25 pm
Charles - I agree 100%. There are many workable standards out there - but the best one is having one and sticking with it.
At first I was worried about putting...
October 3, 2005 at 8:25 pm
Wangkhar,
With the correct scripting or migration tools, explicit constraint names aren't necessary. I don't object to constraint naming conventions - but I find that for a team of developers and dbas,...
October 3, 2005 at 11:02 am
Hi,
I figured this article would get some discussion! I like the usp_ convention - but I know of those who do not. 100 DBAs = 100 Naming conventions. That was why...
October 3, 2005 at 6:51 am
Hi All,
One common question I get about this article is about the email not working. The article's example assumes you have a valid, open relay SMTP service running from your...
September 23, 2005 at 11:32 am
I'm sure with Yukon we'll learn if this (Information_Schema views) was an idea that will die on the vine. In the meantime, Books Online indicates that this is the...
September 18, 2003 at 7:44 am
From the Author: My apologies for the Transact-SQL formating. The code examples work fine - they just look a little strange.
September 18, 2003 at 5:36 am
Just an addendum to my article - for the
"INSERT #Errors EXEC xp_readerrorlog", this extended proc is in the master database... So change it to:
INSERT #Errors EXEC master..xp_readerrorlog
Also - remember...
June 13, 2003 at 5:43 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)